Originally Posted by
Pierre Dénommée
The motion still infringes on the right of the VM.
It is a basic democratic right of the VM to get the first shot at electing the replacement of a removed director. The remaining directors only appoint under section 132 if the VM chose not to elect. This is the danger of removing a director : the VM could open the nominations immediately after the removal and force a rushed election with unprepared candidates.
There is no such thing as an interim president in the Law. In case of a removal, the person elected or appointed will be the full CFC president, with all the privileges associated to this position, until the next AGM.