Originally Posted by
Michael von Keitz
My understanding of your intention is essentially for a new report to be presented in April, based on a mandate of covering the minimum requirements for compliance with the Act. It seems better to raise that question if this report is rejected.
Originally Posted by
Christopher Mallon
It's hard to say since we have no actual motion to amend. Just some hint that there will be a motion to ratify or accept the framework.
Therefore, I will propose the following amendment to whatever that motion is:
"
I believe I was clear in my intention that this was an amendment. If I had had the actual wording of the motion, I would have been even more clear.
Christopher Mallon
FIDE Arbiter