PDA

View Full Version : The Structure of the CFC



Bob Armstrong
03-01-2010, 03:30 PM
I have been having some discussions with various people about the current status of the CFC ( is it drifting currently? ), and whether there needs to be any more restructuring of the organization to get it back on track. One issue has been the outsourcing of the CFC's office functions to EKG, who provide to CFC Gerry Litchfield, as filling the E.D. position. I myself never favoured the outsourcing contract by former president David Lavin, as I've posted recently. This is no criticism of EKG nor of Gerry. It is a question of what is the best administrative design for CFC to help it meet its corporate objectives.

Here are some of my thoughts on these issues:

# 1. The Governors - The CFC is the governors. I am totally supportive of the governor structure as it is. I did try at the July 2009 AGM to cut the number of provincial representative governors in half, but that motion failed. I can live with that. I have 2 motions now before the governors to remove past presidents of more than 5 years ( thus eliminating the Life Governor situation), and to make them governors-at-large without vote for 10 years. I also have filed a motion to impose an activity criteria on governors, or they can be removed if they do not participate. I see the governors as making all major decisions: financial, policy and administrative. I think this system works.

# 2.The Executive - The executive run the day-to-day operations on behalf of the governors, and so their decision-making power is actually quite limited, and administrative.

#3. Budget – the executive will, in consultation with the ED, create a budget, to be presented to the governors one month prior to the start of the fiscal year, which is by March 31. Maurice is now trying to see if he can meet this deadline. Foundation funds will not be used for ongoing CFC operations. It will only be accessed for major projects approved by the Governors. The ED would be a major person to consult with on financial planning. Maurice is now dealing with Gerry on the 2010-11 budget ( they meet tomorrow, as I understand it ).

# 4. Executive Director - I prefer that the CFC not renew the outsourcing contract with EKG, and hire Gerry, if available, or some other good person, as an ED " employee " again. The ED. may be the public face of the CFC, but he is supervised by the executive as an employee, and does not have any policy/administrative powers of his own. The executive determine what information is made available to an ED. An appeal by the ED is possible to the Governors. It has been a bit of a struggle between the executive/president and the Governors as to whether the President can terminate the ED when that was an “ employee “ position. There is precedent that this has been done by the president on his own authority, without governor authorization, and there may be a pro bono legal opinion that this is an administrative operational decision within the scope of the president. I disagree with this – other staff, the President can hire and fire – but he can’t terminate the ED – that is a “ major “ administrative decision for the governors.

#5. AGM - I chair a subcommittee that hopes to make the AGM interactive by audio, and perhaps even interactive by video. All governors from across the country will be able to attend the AGM from their home computer.


#6. New CFC Website – This capital project will have to be funded out of the building sale trust funds being held by the Chess Foundation of Canada, such final decision to be made by the Governors.

Added by later editing at the request of Governor Egis Zeromskis:

# 7. Provincial Affiliates - The CFC is a true federation. The provinces are allocated a certain number of seats in the CFC Assembly of Governors, based on membership totals in the provinces/territories. The CFC Handbook makes clear that they are elected by the CFC members in the Province ( in Ontario, the CFC member elects only the governors for his/her region ), not appointed by the Provincial Affiliate. However, as far as I can tell, once elected the CFC Governor becomes independent - he is a true representative. He has total discretion about how he votes and what he does. The Provincial Affiliate cannot direct their governors how to vote, or what to do. Please point me to any source references that may counter this opinion.

However, I fear that the above fact has led the Provincial Affiliates to wash their hands of their CFC governors once elected. The provinces as far as I know do not try to influence the governors on CFC votes; they do not hold any meetings of their CFC governors to plan strategy at the CFC. In fact, even in the election process, they seem to be falling down. We have a less than 50% voting participation rate on CFC motions. Governors are failing to do their job of governing. And only the Provincial Affiliate, through their CFC members, can affect this situation. The Provincial Affiliates are not beating the bushes to find the best CFC members of their province to stand for nomination. And the CFC members in the province have to take responsibility when they elect deadwood governors to represent them. I feel the provincial affiliates need to put this on the agenda of their next provincial affiliate meeting, and discuss how they can do better.

# 8. Membership - CFC is not really a true " member " organization. It barely makes the definition. There is a very truncated role only for CFC members. They only have one official power - to elect the CFC Governors for their province ( and in Ontario, they elect only the governors for their region ). Other than that they have no direct voice in the running to the CFC. This is enshrined in section 14 of Bylaw # 1 in the CFC Handbook:

LIMITATION OF RIGHTS

14. No individual Member shall have any right to be heard on any matter pertaining to the affairs of the Federation, or his individual membership. Should any individual member be aggrieved by any matter arising in the conduct of the affairs of the Federation, his remedy shall be to bring the matter before his provincial organization, and if there be no Provincial Organization in the Province in which he resides, he may bring the matter to the attention of a Governor representing such Province. Any complaints or suggestions of any individual Member shall be sufficiently dealt with by the Federation Secretary, if he shall reply to such individual Member quoting this By-law.

So membership is more about the benefits of CFC membership: the national rating; the monthly Canadian Chess News Newsletter; and the supporting of chess in Canada through the CFC. Bob Gillanders, former governor, former CFC Treasurer, and former CFC E.D. was the drafter, I think, of the current CFC Website exposition on the membership page of these benefits:

What benefits do I get as a member of the C.F.C.?

When you become a member of the CFC, you join a fraternity of chess players, enthusiasts, teachers, and organizers from across Canada devoted to promoting chess. The CFC represents Canada to the world as a member of FIDE, the international chess body. The CFC sends teams to the Chess Olympiad, World Youth Chess Championship, and other major international events. The CFC holds national championships (including the Canadian Open, Canadian Youth Chess Championship, Canadian Closed, Canadian Women’s Championship) to showcase Canadian talent. The CFC website keeps players informed on is what happening including tournament listings, tournament reports and news items, listings of local chess clubs, and so much more. Your membership dues support all these activities to help ensure chess prospers in Canada. As a member, you are welcomed at CFC events across Canada, including national tournaments, weekend swisses, and local club tournaments.

Other benefits of membership include:

A national CFC chess rating,
Subscription to the monthly Canadian Chess News, an electronic newsletter,
And discount prices at the CFC online store.

There has never been any groundswell of member dissatisfaction with the current membership situation ( though there has been some complaint by some that there is insufficient value for the amount of the yearly membership fee - with which I strongly disagree - chess is cheap in comparison to other hobbies and belonging to governing organizations - it is currently $ 36 for the CFC portion of new membership fees collected - the provinces add on their membership fees and the CFC collects it for them when it sells its membership).

In my experience as an active member, before becoming governor, and as an organizer at the grassroots of CFC members, I found my local governors most cooprerative in advising me of CFC matters, bringing motions on my behalf, etc. Admittedly, few organizations are structured this way, and so change could be sought to give members a greater role, if the membership really wanted such a role, based on comparisons with other major organizations. But so far, the status quo has been generally accepted.

I'd be pleased to hear any comments on some of these fundamental CFC ideas.

Bob

Egidijus Zeromskis
03-01-2010, 06:22 PM
You should include Members and Provinces.

Christopher Mallon
03-01-2010, 06:26 PM
#1: A bit at a time... let's see if these changes go through (hopefully) and if so how they affect things.
#2: When they don't communicate with the Governors, it ends up being more like running all operations, not just day-to-day. Not to mention operating without an approved budget, and approving major increases in expenditures without Governor approval. I'm not saying this is wrong or right, just that what you seem to like isn't actually happening.
#3: Budget deadlines should be set in stone in the handbook.
#4: This is really two points. I disagree strongly that the governors should have ANYTHING to do with the hiring/firing of ANY employee. Employee matters should not be a political decision, nor should they be public which going to the Governors would require. As the handbook is written the President has the sole authority here, although I believe all the recent precedent has been at the Executive level, which I think is best. For point b, OK you want an employee again? We need a bit more of a plan, how do you get from the current setup to the one you want? EKG provides so much more than just an employee - they have facilities, additional expertise, equipment, etc etc.
#5. Well I'm on that committee soo......
#6. Step #1, have 3 governors agree to be on a Website committee and make sure they are all tech-savvy. Step #2, put a line item in the budget for the website (at least $10000) and authorize the committee to award this money based on a public RFP process. Step #3, get it done! We've been talking about a new website for the CFC since 2004 now, and what we have was already obsolete then - 5 1/2 years ago!

Bob Armstrong
03-03-2010, 09:36 AM
Hi Chris:

# 4 - The EKG Outsourcing Contract has always been a bit of a mystery to me. The executive has treated this as " confidential ", and this seems to mean that they won't disclose anything to even the governors. This I don't agree with. The outsourcing of the whole operation is a major budget and administrative decision and should never have been made by David Lavin on his own authority.

I ask the President, if he's listening, to disclose the contract to the governors, with a clear explanation of the no. of hours Gerry is supposed to supply, what EKG is supposed to do above that, and what they in fact have done beyond supplying Gerry.

The governors need to know this to govern.

# 6 - I think Eric should let us know how the new website is progressing. I put him in touch with a CFC member IT specialist, whom he contacted, and whom, as far as I know, is now working on terms of a Request for Proposals. I have assumed it will be brought to the governors when he needs $$ authorization, but it needs to come before it is put out to the public. At that time, maybe your 3-person governor committee can be formed to vet what has been done.

Again, I ask the President to provide a status update. ( I hope I don't have to wait a month, and then get the answer that he is too busy to respond to governors questions/requests. I'm sort of getting tired of that ).

These answers can be supplied on the Governors' Discussion Board to maintain the confidential aspec to this information.

Bob

Maurice Smith
03-04-2010, 12:34 PM
As usual Bob and I agree on some items and tend to agree to disagree on some items. That has been a history of our chess life. However all our discussions have always had reasonable statements made on both sides and made in an amicable manner. That is the situation here.

I agree more with what Gordon Ritchie stated about a month ago in his statement about Governors. Our organization is so small compared to most organizations, the idea of around sixty Governors debating back and forth forever on items that can clearly be resolved quickly and efficiently by a competent Executive is preposterous. Major policy items such as the move, getting out of the book business, the magazine are all items for the Governors. I would say all policy, some financial and only a few administrative
items are for the Governors. All else is for the Executive. Actually I would like to see the Executive plus one Governor from each Province and Territory make up the Governing body of the CFC. Of course then you would get Ontario complaining that they have most members so they should have more representation and then we are back to square one.

On the contract with EKG, let us go back a year or so. The CFC was in dire straits losing around $30,000 a year and all you heard was that we must have a radical change of direction. So we did! Out of this a contract was formed with EKG to in effect be Managers of the CFC. And you know what?
IT WORKS! Barring a huge catastrophy it looks like with two months remaining we will have had a solid successful year. Even a small surplus is now predicted. So do we want to change that after just one year? I think not.
Actually I think the agreement can work even better for us. This would entail our President working out a plan with EKG to initiate a marketing plan in the future. I know it is hard to get your head around the fact that the person who acts as our Executive Director does not actually work for us, but if the situation works, and it does, then we can get used to it. Anyway, we should stay with this at least for the immediate future and maybe with a bit of tweaking make it even better.

Maurice Smith

Kerry Liles
03-04-2010, 01:02 PM
As usual Bob and I agree on some items and tend to agree to disagree on some items. That has been a history of our chess life. However all our discussions have always had reasonable statements made on both sides and made in an amicable manner. That is the situation here.

I agree more with what Gordon Ritchie stated about a month ago in his statement about Governors. Our organization is so small compared to most organizations, the idea of around sixty Governors debating back and forth forever on items that can clearly be resolved quickly and efficiently by a competent Executive is preposterous. Major policy items such as the move, getting out of the book business, the magazine are all items for the Governors. I would say all policy, some financial and only a few administrative
items are for the Governors. All else is for the Executive. Actually I would like to see the Executive plus one Governor from each Province and Territory make up the Governing body of the CFC. Of course then you would get Ontario complaining that they have most members so they should have more representation and then we are back to square one.

On the contract with EKG, let us go back a year or so. The CFC was in dire straits losing around $30,000 a year and all you heard was that we must have a radical change of direction. So we did! Out of this a contract was formed with EKG to in effect be Managers of the CFC. And you know what?
IT WORKS! Barring a huge catastrophy it looks like with two months remaining we will have had a solid successful year. Even a small surplus is now predicted. So do we want to change that after just one year? I think not.
Actually I think the agreement can work even better for us. This would entail our President working out a plan with EKG to initiate a marketing plan in the future. I know it is hard to get your head around the fact that the person who acts as our Executive Director does not actually work for us, but if the situation works, and it does, then we can get used to it. Anyway, we should stay with this at least for the immediate future and maybe with a bit of tweaking make it even better.

Maurice Smith

I believe I recall the agreement with EKG included a 'bonus' clause that was somehow related to increased membership numbers... perhaps the effectiveness of that can be examined? I am not sure EKG is the critical cog in the process of generating new members for the CFC (certainly I cannot think of any initiative coming out of EKG or the CFC themselves for that matter). In any case, if the membership levels increased (enough), then EKG stood to benefit...

Egidijus Zeromskis
03-04-2010, 03:17 PM
I believe I recall the agreement with EKG included a 'bonus' clause that was somehow related to increased membership numbers...

I recall same thing (probably, D.L. wrote it here or GLs.)

Christopher Mallon
03-04-2010, 07:42 PM
It's not strictly a bonus clause; it is expected that more members = more work for EKG also.

Paul Leblanc
03-04-2010, 07:58 PM
Maurice has articulated very well some of my own opinions and I'd like to support what he is saying. Specifically:
- the CFC needs some continuity. Give the current model with EKG time to work before making any major changes. I would say give it 3 years. BTW, is it wise to keep rotating the CFC presidency every year? Why not give the next president a 3 year mandate?
- let the executive manage the day to day affairs of the CFC and keep the governors informed (this latter part could be improved). The governors have a right to examine and vote on major issues and the annual budget (which must contain sufficient detail to be understandable.
- I also feel that one governor for each province would be quite sufficient to represent the membership. Why not simply make the president of each provincial chess association a governor of the CFC and leave it at that?
- the CFC must focus on core activities only. They are: the rating system, the website, the bulletin, the relationship with FIDE and the national championships. Forget the ambiguous idea that the CFC must "promote chess". This is a role better suited to the provinces and local organizers.