PDA

View Full Version : CFC Constitutional Coaltion - Governor Activity Rule Motion



Bob Armstrong
08-24-2009, 10:52 PM
The CFC Constitutional Coalition has now revised, and unanimously accepted, a new Motion # 1 on a " Governor Activity Rule " as follows:

Motion # 1 – Governor Activity Rule

Moved: Bob Armstrong; Seconded: Jason Lohner

( submitted on behalf of the CFC Constitutional Coalition, a grassroots’ group of about 40 ordinary CFC members and a few governors, named below in the Notes )

There shall be added to CFC By-law # 2, a new section 23 as follows:

“ 23. Governor Inactivity Rule

Any governor, no matter whether provincial representative governor, or governor at large, including the Executive, appointees, etc., who does not vote, move/second a motion, or make a comment ( on a motion or generally ), in two consecutive Governors’ Letters, shall be removed from office, and their position shall no longer be part of a quorum until their replacement, if any. Should it happen that in a GL there are no motions for either discussion or vote, then that GL shall not be counted for the purposes of this section. Once removed, the Governor and his provincial body/appointing body shall be notified. A request that a by-election be held to fill the vacancy shall also be made to the provincial/territorial organization or that the appointing body appoint a replacement, for the balance of the removed governor’s term. "

Commentary:

In the 2008-9 year, except for the first four motions of the year ( critical CFC restructuring motions in September 2008 ), all motions subsequently have received less than 50 % vote ( some much less ), including the motions at the outgoing governors July 2009 AGM ( including proxies ). Many governors seldom make any comments on motions for discussion, or generally. This participation rate by governors is abysmal. If governors do not want to be involved in governing the CFC, then they should not have stood for office, whether provincial representative, or governor at large representative. It makes the membership skeptical about the governance of the CFC by such neglect of participation. It demoralizes those who are active governors, because they are expecting other governors to share the load, and find there are not other hands to pitch in. Lastly if a constitutional amendment to the CFC Handbook is brought outside of an AGM, the motion not only requires a 2/3 majority, but also a quorum of 50% of the eligible votes. With governors voting less than 50%, constitutional motions cannot be passed outside of the AGM – this is intolerable for an organization that is trying to keep itself legally up-to-date.

Some have suggested that the period of grace should be longer – no communication/vote for 3 consecutive GL’s. Others want the governors to vote on at least one motion every GL, or at least make a comment. We have picked the middle ground of 2 GL’s – no appearance for 2 GL’s, and the governor is removed.

Also, there is an issue of whether the Provincial Association/ appointing body should be able to replace a removed governor. We felt that allowing replacement let the provincial affiliate/appointing body off the hook. They elect/appoint the governors, and we felt they should be taking care that they are good active governors. If they can always replace deadwood governors with other deadwood governors, and never exercise responsible oversight on their governors, what incentive is there for them to ever take the CFC governance seriously? However, if it means they lose a vote for a full balance of the offending governors’ term, maybe next time they will be more careful about whom they elect.

However, it seemed many opposed our view on replacement. As well there was motion 2002-02 in 2001-2 GL 5 that said re governors who were not CFC members, or who had let their membership lapse:

Any provincially elected Governor found not to be a CFC member in good standing shall have his/her voting privileges suspended. Once suspended, the Governor and his provincial body shall be notified and requested to bring his/her membership into good standing not later that 30 days from his/her election or expiration of membership. In the event that the Governor's membership still not be in good standing 30 days after suspension, the president of the provincial/territorial organization and the Governor shall be notified that the Governor's seat is declared vacant. A request that a by-election be held to fill the vacancy shall also be made to the provincial/territorial organization [ bolding added ]. "

This appears to be a strong CFC precedent for allowing replacement of “ suspended “ governors. So we have abandoned our desired position, and adopted the procedure of this CFC precedent ( we are indebted to Governor Egis Zeromskis for drawing our attention to this motion )..

We tried to reduce the number of provincial representation governors ( Motion 2009-14 ) at the July AGM, and it failed to get the 2/3 majority required for a constitutional amendment. One comment from many governors was that an activity requirement rule should precede any action to reduce the number of governors. So we have listened to this criticism and are now bringing this activity motion, as seemed to be desired by many governors.

The CFC needs the help of all governors, and the contribution of all their opinions, to help the CFC run at its best. The first duty of governors is to govern; secondarily, it is expected that the governors will also promote chess in various ways. Governors need to debate with each other in the GL ( and on the Governors’ Discussion Board and the CFC members CFC Chess Forum ) in order to get sound governance decisions. That is why we have such an extensive number of governors. If they do not participate, one wonders why we have them at all. They are just deadwood, names on a website. And they fail to represent the provinces/chess bodies who sent them.

We feel this activity criterion will significantly improve the voting record of governors, and the quality of CFC governance decisions.

Notes:

1. “ Constitutional Amendments “: These amendments are considered “ constitutional amendments “ under Bylaw # 3 of the CFC, section 3, which is: [ refer to Bylaw ]

2. Current CFC Governor Structure:

The current number of Governors-at-Large are:

A - Executive - 7
B – Non-Executive Officers - Masters' Representative and Women's Coordinator - 2
C - Representative of Chess Foundation of Canada, and, Canadian Correspondence Chess Association - 2
D - Canadian Champion and Runner-Up - 2
E – Former CFC Presidents ( some Life Governors ) – 10 ( as now shown on the CFC website ); almost equal the votes of the other Governors-at-Large )

Total – 23

The current number of Provincial Representative Governors ( using 2008-9 ) are:

A - B.C. - 5
B - Alta. - 5
C - Sask. - 1
D - Man. - 2
E - Ont. - 17
F - Que. - 2
G - N.B. - 2
H - P.E.I. - 1
I - N.S. - 2
J - Nfld. & Lab. – 1
K - no reps from the 3 territories ( 3 vacancies )

Total - 38 ( and three vacancies )

Overall Total – 61 ( and three vacancies )

3. CFC Constitutional Coalition Members ( 41 to August 18, 2009 )

Armstrong, Bob – CFC & OCA Life member; past chess club executive
Doucette, Patrick – CFC life member
Garel, Rick – CFC member; current chess club executive
Casareno, Erwin – CFC member
Kitich, Jerry – CFC member; chess teacher; past chess club executive
Broughton, Dave – former CFC Governor and Executive Member
McDonald, Patrick – CFC Life Member; former CFC Junior Coordinator, OCA
Executive; IA, TD and chess organizer; chess club executive; CFC Governor ( Ont. )
Dattani, Dinesh – CFC member
Moysoski, Randy – CFC member; chess club executive; chess organizer
Perez, Michael – CFC member; chess club executive; organizer
Maguire, Jack – CFC member
Deslauriers, Brian – CFC past member
Ritchie, Gordon – CFC member; past CFC Governor
Tim Knechtel – CFC member
Bellomo, Joe – CFC member
Lawless, David – CFC member, former chess club executive, chess teacher, organizer and TD.
Peristy, Luke – CFC member
Villalobos, Oscar – CFC member
Azmitia, Gabriel – CFC member
Verde, Pino – CFC member
Bossy, John – CFC member
Hall, John – CFC member
Brodie, Hugh – CFC member; maintainer of Canadian Games Database
Beal, Greg – CFC member
Kurkowski, Ken – CFC member
Henry, Liam – CFC member, organizer/TD, chess teacher
Posylek, Caesar – CFC member, former CFC Governor, chess club executive
Rutherdale, Will – CFC member
Stein, Mickey – CFC member
Jackiw, Mark – CFC member
Frilles, Ruperto – CFC member
James Marilla - CFC Member
Leward De la Rama - CFC Member
Mani Mehramooz - CFC Member
Matthew Perez – CFC Member
Joey Ayres – CFC Member
Xavier De Guzman – CFC Member
Kasra Ershandi – CFC Member
Paul Leblanc – CFC Member, CFC Governor ( B.C, )
Gillanders, Bob – CFC member; former CFC Executive Director; chess club executive; former CFC Executive
Lohner, James – CFC member; CFC Governor ( B.C. )

( Revision # 1, August 18, 2009 )

The Coalition would like to receive input from governors and ordinary CFC members, before it files this motion formally with the CFC Secretary.

Bob

Christopher Mallon
08-24-2009, 11:08 PM
I'm sorry, I still can not support this motion. Sometimes there can just be nothing to say - I'm sure I've seen two consecutive GLs before with very little to discuss. Why can it not simply be "Two Consecutive Motions" with no voting or abstaining?

Bob Armstrong
08-24-2009, 11:43 PM
Hi Chris:

Certainly your suggestion could be made into an activity rule.

But what you propose is more stringent than our proposal. Under our rule, if there are two motions in one GL, a governor can vote on one only, and still meet the activity rule. Under your proposal, for example, if there were three motions in one GL, and the governor voted on the first, but not on the second and third, s/he'd be gone. This seems too stringent to us - the governor showed in the GL - we'll count that as sufficient activity .

Of course, if you want the rule more stringent, you could always bring a motion amending our motion the way you want, to see if you have more support for your idea, than we do with our more lenient one.

Bob

John Coleman
08-25-2009, 12:45 AM
There are some subjects on which I have nothing to say, for example, FIDE. However, to meet the proposed activity rule, I suppose I could write "no comment", or something similar. Would that count as activity.

I believe Bob's target are those governors who are apparently comatose.

Bob Armstrong
08-25-2009, 01:06 AM
Hi John:

All we are asking is a very lenient, " show up "! Right now we are not trying for more, since up 'til now there's been nothing.

You can move/second a motion, you can vote, you can make a comment ( like " no comment " ) on a motion, you can make a comment under the GL section on " general comments ". Just show your alive, and you'll meet our lenient current criteria in the motion.

Bob

Bob Armstrong
08-27-2009, 12:56 AM
Today the CFC Constitutional Coalition filed with the CFC Secretary their Motion # 1 on a " Governor Activity Rule ", set out in the original post of this thread. It will now be published in GL # 2.

Thanks to everyone who gave us public input before we filed it. It seemed that our motion has general acceptance. Now all we have to do is get the 2/3 majority demanded for this " constitutional " amendment of CFC Bylaw # 2.

Bob