CFC FIDE Representative election - Feb 2021

[Vladimir Drkulec]

There will be an election for the position of CFC FIDE representative at the special meeting starting February 21st. This thread is for candidates to announce and for discussion about the election.

[Vadim Tsypin]

Dear chess friends and colleagues across Canada,

In compliance with the election procedures published (http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/showthread.php?5572-Special-Meeting-of-Voting-Members-Sunday-February-21-to-Thursday-February-25&p=36016#post36016) by the CFC, I have declared my candidacy for the position of the FIDE Representative by notifying the CFC Secretary today. As per the procedures, I will provide all required documents to the CFC by Sunday, February 14.

I truly believe that my background in chess governance, including being a core member of the new FIDE management team since the 2018 FIDE elections, makes me the best candidate for this position. I am confident that I will be able to open the door wide for Canada into world chess and to bring exciting opportunities for Canadian players, coaches, and organizers. I hope that you will entrust me with the development of the CFC’s future at FIDE and vote for me.

[Aris Marghetis]

There will be an election for the position of CFC FIDE representative at the special meeting starting February 21st. This thread is for candidates to announce and for discussion about the election.



Hello everyone, this post is to confirm I am running for the position of CFC FIDE Representative.

I have also advised CFC Secretary Lyle Craver.

Thank you, best regards, Aris Marghetis.

[Vadim Tsypin]

Honourable Voting Members,
Forum users:

I am privileged to present my condensed CV. Please see attached.

Since 2018, FIDE was completely reorganized as a modern, transparent, democratic, business-like sports federation, which allowed it to attract reputable Western sponsors. FIDE has a fully funded budget, audited annually by Ernst & Young. Every year - 2019, 2020, 2021 - we process financial aid applications from National Chess Federations, event organizers, seniors, indigent players, women's groups, scholastic associations, and others; we provide the support requested and distribute the corresponding grants. I believe that my being a core member of the FIDE management makes me the best person to lobby for Canada's interests, to help Canadians navigate support / development programs and to prepare aid applications.

[Andrew Giblon]

Vlad, thanks for opening this discussion. I would like to provide my perspective as a chess dad, and as a former three-time Head of Delegation for Team Canada at the WYCC.

I have had only positive experiences with Aris Marghetis over the years, including when he was an Arbiter at the WYCC in Halkidiki, Greece in 2010, when I was Assistant HOD under him at the NAYCC in Tarrytown, NY in 2011, and when he was an Arbiter at the CYCC in Ottawa in 2013.

That said, I would like to confirm my support for Vadim Tsypin for the role of FIDE Representative from the Chess Federation of Canada. Vadim is highly qualified for this role from two key perspectives:
- Representing Canadian chess within FIDE. Vadim understands and has deep connections within the FIDE organization. He has been serving as a member of the FIDE Management Board for the past several years. He has become a licensed International Arbiter, and has taught FIDE Arbiter courses in several countries.
- Representing children’s chess within Canada. I have known Vadim for almost a decade since we first met as chess dads at a CYCC. Since then, Vadim has played many leadership roles to promote children’s chess. Initially, Vadim served as Assistant Head of Delegation to me at the 2013 WYCC in UAE, where his organization skills were invaluable. Vadim has gone on to organize and/or to be an arbiter at CYCCs, to serve in Chess ‘n Math Association’s leadership, and to organize the qualification process for the annual Susan Polgar Invitational for girls.

On a personal level, I have known Vadim to be fair, impartial, transparent, an advocate for the under-represented, committed without the need for personal gain, and articulate. I am confident that Vadim would represent the CFC’s and the Canadian chess community’s interests well as our FIDE Representative.

[Victor Plotkin]

I am running for the position of CFC FIDE Representative.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

We have three good candidates for this position.

The election will be first past the post. The person with a plurality of the votes wins even if it is not a majority.

All three candidates along with any new entrants will be provided with contact information of voting members upon request, simultaneously (as much as possible). They will need to make a statutory required statement that they will only use the list of emails for purposes of this election or other business related to their roles as voting members.

We hope that each candidate will provide us with their vision for the CFC and its relationship with FIDE going into the future.

[Mahmud Hassain]

[QUOTE=Vadim Tsypin;36141]Dear chess friends and colleagues across Canada,


I truly believe that my background in chess governance, including being a core member of the new FIDE management team since the 2018 FIDE elections, makes me the best candidate for this position.

[Mahmud Hassain]

Hi Vadim,

Thank you for putting your name forward and thank you for disclosing that you are "a core member of the new FIDE management team". Not withstanding your claimed chess activities, I have three questions for you.

1- Does not this disqualify you from representing Canada? To my mind, you are clearly in a conflict of interest position. This should be clear to you and to the voting members. So, which hat will you be wearing and which interest will you be advancing? FIDE or CFC?

2- Do you receive any compensation for your management position in FIDE?

3- Are you currently a governor or a management member of any CFC rival association or organization?

If "yes" to either Question 2 or Question 3, then you must not be a CFC voting member either because it is also a conflict of interest.

Thank you
Mahmud

[Victor Plotkin]

A. Bio

1. Was born in 1968 in Leningrad (St.-Petersburg), Soviet Union (Russia). Immigrated to Israel in 1991 and to Canada in 2002.

Education: 1985-1991 Leningrad Technical University (2 year break for Soviet Army).
1991-1994 Technion (Haifa, Israel) - Masters degree in Math.

2. Portfolio manager since 1991. Manage 2 hedge funds and some big individual clients. Interesting that strong chess players (2000+) make up more than 50% of AUM (assets under management).

3. Married with 3 kids. Rina (CFC 1356), Mark (CFC 2549) and Julia (CFC 1150).

4. Started playing chess at age of 7 in Palace of Pioneers, Leningrad. Played in different team events across the Soviet Union with some famous future GMs: Kamsky, Khalifman, Sakaev and others. Got Candidate Master title in 1984. Wasn't strong enough to get the FIDE rating. Quit chess in 1985 and did not play serious chess games until 2005.

Restarted my chess career in 2003 playing blitz at the Dutton-Dobrich chess club. Got my first FIDE rating in 2005, slightly below 2200.

Got FIDE Master title in 2011 at the Canadian Closed. Didn't feel comfortable with this title since my rating was always below 2300. Finally crossed 2300 level in 2014.

Have 2 IM norms (both from Gibraltar). Current rating 2367. I am extremely overrated now. However... while many players improved their rating by 200 points in 15 years, very few did it from age 37 to age 52 at this level.

5. Have significant experience in different major international events. Attended 4 WYCC with Mark (2010-2013). Played in 5 Gibraltar Open, likely one of the strongest open tournaments. Played in 2 World Senior Championship (2018, 2019).

4 times served as the Captain of Canadian National Team (2012-2018). The best result was 11th place in 2016. My strategy "Eric Hansen plays white" worked well and likely improved our performance.

Served as a coach/captain at U16 Olympiad (Hungary, 2014) for 2 Canadian Teams.

Was a player/captain at World Team Senior in 2018 and 2020. Special thanks to my teammates D.Cummings, I.Findlay and M.Barron for a good atmosphere and strong performance in these events.

6. CFC voting member since 2015 (Master Representative). Made major changes in Olympic rules with F. McKim (2016). While many members didn't like the idea of a Selection Committee, it was finally eliminated only after our motions.

Bonuses and penalties for Canadian Closed likely increased the motivation of strong players to participate in this tournament. I want to thank A.Marghetis and his team for an excellent job organizing last Canadian Closed (2019), which was probably the strongest Closed of the last 20 years. Hopefully, our motions also contributed to this success.

Did research with our Rating Auditor P. Leblanc which demonstrated the significant CFC-FIDE gap. The results and recommendations were approved by the CFC President. Now every player without a CFC rating (but with established FIDE) gets CFC = FIDE + 125 initial rating.

B. Platform

1. CFC-FIDE relationship.

On Aug 6, 2018 (2 months before the FIDE election) I posted on Chesstalk "Probably, Dvorkovich becomes a favorite to win the president election". I tried to convince the CFC leadership to support him, but the executives supported Macro.

Generally speaking, I am moderately satisfied with his presidentship so far, I give him a B+ for what he has done so far. I liked some changes that he made for the Championship Circle. The Grand Swiss giving the winner a spot in the Candidate Tournament (instead of qualification by rating) looks like a big improvement. Some progress has been made in the Women championship circle. I do have my personal opinion about transparency and sponsorship issues, but would prefer to discuss it in a different format.

I did not like Dvorkovich's crisis management skills and his decisions for the Candidate Tournament and during online Olympiad. At the same time, it's not fair to criticize him - it was a very difficult and completely new situation, which required some tough decisions.

Vlad mentioned "strained" CFC-FIDE relationship. I am sure I can improve it, if elected. My generally positive attitude towards the current FIDE leadership will not guarantee automatic support. If I have to object or ask unpleasant questions, I'll do it.

The CFC needs to work more with FIDE, and especially with FIDE America to get more Pan-American tournaments to Canada. I am talking not only about the American championship, but also about Youth, Junior, Women and Senior events.

I see this process as a long term project, which requires a lot of time and effort. However, we need to start working on it.

If elected, I would pay special attention to international team events, which are, from my experience, the most interesting and memorable tournaments, especially for young players.

Canada has excellent arbiters and I will try my best to get more official FIDE events for them.

I am sure I can communicate with the current FIDE leadership. I spoke with E.Sutovsky many times at Chess Olympiads and in Gibraltar. I have never spoken with Dvorkovich, but we have a lot in common and it shouldn't be difficult to build a solid relationship. In fact my oldest daughter graduated from the same Law School at Duke University last year.

If elected, I will not hesitate to ask for help and advice from Vadim Tsypin (who is very close to the current FIDE leadership) in certain situations. I was a good student my entire life. I learn fast.

2. Work with CFC president.

I know Vlad for many years, and we were able to build a very good relationship well before he became the CFC president (2013) and my first involvement in Olympiad Team (2012). I believe, as a human being, I understand him well.

For the last several years, we have had a lot of conversations about a variety of issues. Sometimes he accepted my point, sometimes he preferred his own solution. However, I was always able to express and explain my opinion.

While I am not happy with some of his recent decisions, I am absolutely sure we can successfully collaborate for the best of CFC and Canadian chess in general.

3. FIDE representative is also a director who should participate in voting. With my experience as a player, parent, captain, and voting member, I hope to provide enough logic and common sense. At the same time, I will be quiet if I am not competent enough for some problems.

The main point for me - we should follow our own rules. If we don't like them, we have to change them from time to time; but we have to adhere to them. Consistently following our own rules is key to improving the CFC image and allowing us to get more respect from regular players.

C. Personal

My previous public election was in 2012 for the position of Olympic Team Captain. There were 3 candidates for this position: Y.Ochkoos, V.Rekhson and myself. Only 5 team players were allowed to vote. I won with the smallest possible margin. For me, it is very important to remain on good terms with other candidates and I am really happy that we managed to maintain a good and respectful relationship.

I hope for the same with both A.Marghetis and V.Tsypin.

[Mahmud Hassain]

Dear Voting Members,

In the CV provided here by Vadim, it is stated that Vadim is a Vice President of the CMA, which answers my Question 3 above. The CFC has commercial contracts with the CMA.
There is a conflict of interest here and it is incumbent upon all of you to safeguard our federation. It is your duty to do so.
So, through you President Vlad, I am requesting that either Vadim resign from CMA or he must resign from CFC voting members privilege.

Thank you
Mahmud

[Vladimir Drkulec]

Dear Voting Members,

In the CV provided here by Vadim, it is stated that Vadim is a Vice President of the CMA, which answers my Question 3 above. The CFC has commercial contracts with the CMA.
There is a conflict of interest here and it is incumbent upon all of you to safeguard our federation. It is your duty to do so.
So, through you President Vlad, I am requesting that either Vadim resign from CMA or he must resign from CFC voting members privilege.

Thank you
Mahmud


3- Are you currently a governor or a management member of any CFC rival association or organization?


You are under some misapprehensions of the facts.

The CMA is not a rival association or organization.

A conflict of interest has to be declared. Being an officer or member of the board of the CMA is not a conflict of interest.

The CFC does not have commercial contracts with the CMA.

Having commercial contracts with the CMA would not prevent someone from being a voting member or on the board of directors of the CFC.

Vadim is a voting member by virtue of the fact that he was nominated by the FQE as one of their three voting members. We do have agreements in place with the FQE. Are you suggesting that any voting member from the FQE is somehow illegitimate because we have such an agreement?

If having some relationship with the CMA was an automatic conflict of interest there would be many of the voting members that would need to resign as a number of them teach chess for the CMA.

EDIT: Actually they would have to declare a conflict of interest, they wouldn't have to resign.

The CMA is an organization which the CFC often works with.

I myself have directed tournaments for the CMA in Windsor because parents asked me to.

I believe at one point we had a tournament that was both a YCC and a CMA event at the same time and I directed it and organized it.

I believe that CFC Youth Coordinator Christina Tao may have also organized a CMA event or two at some point. I am pretty sure that I directed at least one or two for her.

The CMA hires many chess players to teach for them. That is not a conflict of interest. Our interests are not opposed, they are complementary. They tend to organize tournaments for children which are even sometimes CFC rated like the North American Youth Chess Championship.

[Vadim Tsypin]

Hi Vadim,

Thank you for putting your name forward and thank you for disclosing that you are "a core member of the new FIDE management team". Not withstanding your claimed chess activities, I have three questions for you.

Hello Mahmud,

I am pleased to see your keen interest in the CFC FIDE Representative election. For the Voting Members’ benefit, I am always glad to answer questions that are asked in a polite manner. I am confident that this discussion will open the eyes of the Canadian chess public. A constructive dialog and evidence-based verified information will help Canadians to learn the truth about new FIDE, including the new structure codified in the FIDE Charter adopted at the Extraordinary General Assembly in Abu Dhabi on February 28, 2020.



1- Does not this disqualify you from representing Canada? To my mind, you are clearly in a conflict of interest position. This should be clear to you and to the voting members. So, which hat will you be wearing and which interest will you be advancing? FIDE or CFC?


The answer is simple and straightforward – it doesn’t. FIDE unites 195 National Chess Federations (NCFs). FIDE and the NCFs have shared and aligned interests; they are not on the opposing sides. The FIDE Mission spelled out in the new Charter makes development of chess and strengthening the national federations FIDE’s explicit goals. Improving chess players’ social conditions and well-being is yet another area where FIDE and NCFs work hand in hand.

A layperson that is not experienced in chess governance and international affairs might be surprised to learn that FIDE actually finances the national chess federations and the specific projects they put forward. The financing is done through the direct FIDE-NCF agreement, through the FIDE Development fund and through the funding that FIDE allocates to its four continents.

Each and every person working at FIDE – be it in a paid / unpaid Commission position, an appointed FIDE Council position, or an appointed management team position – remains a patriot, a representative of their national federation, and an efficient lobbyist for the country whose flag she or he is honoured to wear on their sleeve.

I suggest that anyone interested in this issue studies the FIDE Charter which specifically addresses the dual role of those FIDE Council members who are official representatives (delegates) for their federations. Similar provisions welcome participation of Member Federations’ representatives in other FIDE bodies.

The FIDE Council is “a strategic and oversight FIDE body with law-making and executive functions.” Some of the people appointed by the FIDE President to the Council, like my dear friends and colleagues Jiangchuan Ye and Gulkiz Tulay, are also the official FIDE representatives (delegates) from their respective countries, China and Turkey, and they work tirelessly to provide opportunities such as tournaments, seminars, player development for their home countries.

The FIDE Management Board is “the executive, operational and administrative body that assists the President in the day-to-day management of FIDE activities.” We are eleven (11) people appointed personally by the FIDE President and approved by the Council. This is the body that “manages ordinary activities and resources; coordinates current activities of officials, Commissions, offices and employees; provides draft budget; supervises implementation of the budget; approves contracts.”

Several members of the FIDE Management Board who are the official FIDE representatives (delegates) from their respective countries.

GM Victor Bologan, FIDE Executive Director, is a delegate for Moldova.
GM Mohd Al-Mudahka, FIDE International Director, is a delegate for Qatar.
IO Berik Balgabaev, Advisor to the FIDE President, is a delegate for Kazakhstan.


They have made their respective federations very active in FIDE affairs and achieved many agreements that were mutually beneficial for FIDE and those countries.

I am privileged to work daily side-by-side with all these above-mentioned esteemed friends and colleagues, as well as many other FIDE officials who represent their countries in a dignified and highly efficient manner, such as FIDE Council General Secretary Enyonam Sewa “Noël” Fumey (delegate from Togo), FIDE Vice-President Michael Khodarkovsky (delegate for the United States of America), FIDE Vice-President Anastasia Sorokina (delegate for Belarus), FIDE Vice-President Mahir Mammedov (delegate for Azerbaijan), FIDE Vice-President Akaki Iashvili (delegate for Georgia). I am confident that I will be as efficient as they are to bring exciting new opportunities for Canadian players, coaches and organizers once the CFC Voting Members trust me with the position of a delegate from Canada.




2- Do you receive any compensation for your management position in FIDE?

Since the President Arkady Dvorkovich’s 2018 electoral triumph, FIDE started its transformation into a transparent, open, democratic, streamlined institution that is modeled after the best Western corporations. We have a dedicated executive team. The executive compensation numbers are published in the FIDE budget (such as the 2021 budget, presented at the Dec 2020 General Assembly). As was reported to the FIDE Council at the time, the salaries for FIDE managers were cut across the board since the COVID-19 pandemic started in 2020, and remain at those reduced levels. Among other FIDE executives, I do receive compensation for my work.



3- Are you currently a governor or a management member of any CFC rival association or organization?

I am not aware of the existence of any “CFC rival associations or organizations”.


If "yes" to either Question 2 or Question 3, then you must not be a CFC voting member either because it is also a conflict of interest.
As I’ve already explained above, there is *no* conflict of interest, either from the FIDE side or from the CFC side. Both federations are partners working for the same objectives. I am puzzled by your statement that FIDE and the CFC are opponents; I suggest strongly that you study the Charter and other relevant FIDE documents.

Suffice it to say that the Chairman of the elected FIDE Constitutional Commission (CON), which reviews and oversees compliance with “FIDE Charter, Bylaws, Electoral Rules, Ethics and Disciplinary Code, Financial Rules”, is distinguished jurist and academic Roberto Rivello. Maitre Rivello is a delegate for Italy and he does a wonderful job promoting his country’s interests.

FIDE has the Code of Ethics; the Ethics and Disciplinary Commission is chaired by a renowned lawyer François Strydom (South Africa). The CFC has its Continuance papers properly filed with Corporations Canada.

I am in full compliance with both. Electing me to the CFC FIDE Representative position will be in full compliance with both. As already stated, I will look after Canada’s interests and will promote Canada’s agenda.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

Being an officer or member of the board of the CMA is not a conflict of interest.

Vlad, in some cases it might be. Though it is not called a conflict of interest; just simple "interest". You might find that in the NFP Act.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

GM Victor Bologan, FIDE Executive Director, is a delegate for Moldova.

The FIDE website says differently

President/Delegate - Dodon, Igor
Vice-President - Bologan, Victor

We know how fast HB was removed from the FIDE website, the above information is up to date, isn't?

Anyway, the nearest CFC elections not for a FIDE delegate.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

Vlad, in some cases it might be. Though it is not called a conflict of interest; just simple "interest". You might find that in the NFP Act.

I was addressing Mahmud's post. He used that terminology.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

I was addressing Mahmud's post. He used that terminology.

His terminology is good when dealing within FIDE.

"16.12 FIDE officials may not simultaneously hold another position within the organisation that creates a conflict of interest"

Probably you as a President shall contact the FIDE Ethic commission to get a confirmation that there would be no conflict of interest between " Secretary of the FIDE MB / Deputy Head of the TAD " and "Zonal President".

[Vladimir Drkulec]

His terminology is good when dealing within FIDE.

"16.12 FIDE officials may not simultaneously hold another position within the organisation that creates a conflict of interest"

Probably you as a President shall contact the FIDE Ethic commission to get a confirmation that there would be no conflict of interest between " Secretary of the FIDE MB / Deputy Head of the TAD " and "Zonal President".

Vernon Howard's
SECRETS OF LIFE (R)

************************************************** ********************

"THE POWER OF THEMASWOT

How many times have you found yourself involved with a person or
event only to later regret it? This exercise keeps you out of
trouble in the first place.

The whole idea is for you to be on guard against invitations and
suggestions that look like fun at first but which turn out to be
painful traps. A person will get you involved in something, then
suddenly lose interest in it, leaving you with the responsibilities
and even the debts. Such a person is a hit-and-run artist.

Employ the power of Themaswot. This special word was created to
help you recognize a trap when meeting one.

Themaswot means, 'Themaswot makes the suggestions are the ones who
must do the work, make the decisions and pay the money.' Let this
be your attitude toward deceptive people. Stay away from their
lures. Do not let them unload their follies onto you. Let their
problems remain their problems. The person who causes grief is
the person who must suffer from it and correct it. This is a
Law of Life.

These sly invitations are far more numerous and dangerous than
you may now see. Become aware of them; then let Themaswot keep
you safe."

Practical Exercises for Inner Harmony, # 4


Go to the New Life Bookstore: https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.anewlife.org%2Findex.html&data=02%7C01%7Cvdrkulec%40hotmail.com%7Cbc905c496b bc4c7a0e0b08d530ca9920%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaa aaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636468569060873415&sdata=LAcg6ODe2OSnML79iLzBzREL4HQC38rjdkMJb3wYla8% 3D&reserved=0

************************************************** ********************

Visit the SECRETS OF LIFE Archives of Vernon Howard quotes:
https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchive.mail-list.com%2Fsecretsoflife&data=02%7C01%7Cvdrkulec%40hotmail.com%7Cbc905c496b bc4c7a0e0b08d530ca9920%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaa aaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636468569060873415&sdata=Gkf9uunbDetE9cLllIRTS8O5USCV7nd0kesIrDc2BNo% 3D&reserved=0

[Nikolay Noritsyn]

Vernon Howard's
SECRETS OF LIFE (R)

************************************************** ********************

"THE POWER OF THEMASWOT

How many times have you found yourself involved with a person or
event only to later regret it? This exercise keeps you out of
trouble in the first place.

The whole idea is for you to be on guard against invitations and
suggestions that look like fun at first but which turn out to be
painful traps. A person will get you involved in something, then
suddenly lose interest in it, leaving you with the responsibilities
and even the debts. Such a person is a hit-and-run artist.

Employ the power of Themaswot. This special word was created to
help you recognize a trap when meeting one.

Themaswot means, 'Themaswot makes the suggestions are the ones who
must do the work, make the decisions and pay the money.' Let this
be your attitude toward deceptive people. Stay away from their
lures. Do not let them unload their follies onto you. Let their
problems remain their problems. The person who causes grief is
the person who must suffer from it and correct it. This is a
Law of Life.

These sly invitations are far more numerous and dangerous than
you may now see. Become aware of them; then let Themaswot keep
you safe."

Practical Exercises for Inner Harmony, # 4


Go to the New Life Bookstore: https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.anewlife.org%2Findex.html&data=02%7C01%7Cvdrkulec%40hotmail.com%7Cbc905c496b bc4c7a0e0b08d530ca9920%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaa aaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636468569060873415&sdata=LAcg6ODe2OSnML79iLzBzREL4HQC38rjdkMJb3wYla8% 3D&reserved=0

************************************************** ********************

Visit the SECRETS OF LIFE Archives of Vernon Howard quotes:
https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Farchive.mail-list.com%2Fsecretsoflife&data=02%7C01%7Cvdrkulec%40hotmail.com%7Cbc905c496b bc4c7a0e0b08d530ca9920%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaa aaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636468569060873415&sdata=Gkf9uunbDetE9cLllIRTS8O5USCV7nd0kesIrDc2BNo% 3D&reserved=0


“It seemed to K. as if at last those people had broken off all relations with him, and as if now in reality he were freer than he had ever been, and at liberty to wait here in this place usually forbidden to him as long as he desired, and had won a freedom such as hardly anybody else had ever succeeded in winning, and as if nobody could dare touch him or drive him away, or even speak to him, but — this conviction was at least equally as strong — as if at the same time there was nothing more senseless, more hopeless, than this freedom, this waiting, this inviolability.”
― Franz Kafka, The Castle

[Pierre Dénommée]

The Conflict of Interest provisions of the NFP Act are far more lenient then their counterpart in the Canada Business Corporations Act.

If CMA did not exist, all children in their program may be CFC due paying members playing CFC rated games instead of CMA rated games. When I was an FQE director, the board did notice that the actual transfer rate from CMA to actual due-paying FQE members involved in competitive chess was negligible. CMA produces titled players in small quantity. I doubt that either the CFC or the FQE could replace CMA if it closes tomorrow.

All that is required is a declaration of the Conflict of Interest and to abstain in votes that could affect CMA.

https://educaloi.qc.ca/en/capsules/incorporated-non-profits-organizations-conflicts-of-interest-of-directors/

[Vladimir Drkulec]

The Conflict of Interest provisions of the NFP Act are far more lenient then their counterpart in the Canada Business Corporations Act.

If CMA did not exist, all children in their program may be CFC due paying members playing CFC rated games instead of CMA rated games. When I was an FQE director, the board did notice that the actual transfer rate from CMA to actual due-paying FQE members involved in competitive chess was negligible. CMA produces titled players in small quantity. I doubt that either the CFC or the FQE could replace CMA if it closes tomorrow.

All that is required is a declaration of the Conflict of Interest and to abstain in votes that could affect CMA.

https://educaloi.qc.ca/en/capsules/incorporated-non-profits-organizations-conflicts-of-interest-of-directors/



To paraphrase a line from a Clint Eastwood movie. "A NFP has to know its limitations." Yes, we have one contractor/employee. We have to set priorities.

Warren Buffet suggests that people and corporations should come up with a list of their top 25 priorities or tasks and then rank those priorities in order of importance. Once satisfied with the ranking they should draw a line under number five on their list and then never again work on number six through twenty five and instead concentrate all of their attention on priority number one through five. Of course they should also periodically reevaluate their list of priorities and make changes that reflect the reality of their new situation much as we must reassess the situation on a chessboard as each move changes the character of the position.

All the people playing online chess may become CFC due paying members playing CFC rated games instead of Chess.com or lichess.org rated games.

The hard part is translating these modifiers of "may" and their inherent uncertainty from potentiality to actuality.

Hope is not a strategy and neither is coveting the results of someone else's labour. I know that you Pierre are not doing that but others in these threads are doing that.

[Svitlana Demchenko]

Hello everyone, my name is Svitlana Demchenko, some of you may know me from youth events or the Woman Olympiad team. I don’t usually post on sites, but this seems to be an interesting discussion.

I’m lucky to know all three candidates, Aris, Victor, and Vadim as very good professionals, and people in general. I was privileged to travel for many tournaments in our country and internationally, but my hometown is Ottawa and I play regularly at the RA Club (or, rather, played, before the pandemic). Thus, I had many interactions over the years with Aris Marghetis and I respect him as a solid professional, who is very good at organizing and arbitrating chess tournaments for both CFC and CMA. I also had positive experiences with Victor Plotkin, who I know as a strong player and very professional team captain. I have witnessed Victor’s successful management of the men’s team at Batumi Olympiad and great leadership at the 2020 Online Olympiad for our team – he is amply qualified for that position.

However, for the position of CFC FIDE Representative, I would like to express my support for Vadim Tsypin. As I know, Vadim is part of FIDE management and has already taken many crucial actions that benefited our chess community, especially young players.

In my experience with him at many events, he was always helpful, kind, and very resourceful. At the 2019 World U-16 Youth Chess Olympiad in Turkey, Vadim had the job of the FIDE Technical Delegate. Still, however incredibly overloaded he was, Vadim always found time to help Team Canada. He made sure to see the team well before each round, took note of our requests, and resolved them all in no time. Another example was bringing Team Canada (all-expenses-paid!), to the 14th edition of the Vladimir Dvorkovich Cup in 2019, held in Kazakhstan. It was the first time ever that Canada was invited, and our participation only became possible because of Vadim’s stature at FIDE. This was the first time in many years that my teammates and I were able to participate in an international Rapid and Blitz event. Cynthia, Adam, Henry, and I absolutely loved our time at the VDC, thanks to Vadim’s endless care and attention. All four of us Canadian players saw with our own eyes how much respect and deference Vadim garners among his fellow FIDE executives, state and national federations’ officials, coaches, players, and the FIDE President.

Thinking about the next cohort of young players, wouldn’t it be great if they, too, could get the same support and opportunities that we did? I am sure that electing Vadim Tsypin as the CFC FIDE Representative will be a huge benefit to the Canadian youth, and the chess community as a whole.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

Thank you, Svitlana! Its great to see the younger generation getting involved in the CFC and its governance. When the time comes this will be yours, and Rohan's and Cynthia's and Adam's and Henry's to carry into the future for the benefit of generations to come. When I taught at university, I found my chess students were more articulate and able to express themselves clearly than many of my university students and this pattern continues with your post.

[Aris Marghetis]

Aris' mini-bio:

Hello everyone, in the last couple of weeks for our family, with a death and three hospitalizations, I've been slow to post my bio for CFC FIDE Representative.

In the meantime, here's a link to my position at the FIDE Arbiters' Commission:

https://arbiters.fide.com/about-the-arb/team-arb-2/team-arb-aris-marghetis

Thank you, best regards, Aris Marghetis.

[Maroun Tomb]

Hi Vadim,

I am pleased to see you are applying for this position.

Ever since you started organizing tournaments in Montreal in 2017, you helped the trend to have most Quebec tournaments registered in chess-results and become FIDE rated. You grew the number of tournaments especially for U20 players and ensured it had FIDE rated games. This helped a lot of young QC players acquire a FIDE rating and having a national ranking in the FIDE list. I think you brought a lot of value there and enabled positive changes.

I was happy to see you in Batumi, Georgia at the 2018 Chess Olympiads and noticed your energy and high engagement in helping Canada be well represented. I am certain that if you end up being the selected candidate, you will give it your 100%.

Best of luck!

Stay safe,
NM & FIDE CM Maroun Tomb.

[Anna Burtasova]

As the election approaches, I would like to put my two cents in the discussion.

I am new to the Canadian chess scene and I feel privileged that I received a very warm welcome from all the people I've met so far. Maybe I am naive but I believe that we have a friendly community bonded by our love to the game and desire for chess in Canada to develop and prosper.

I voted for the elections to be held, and I am happy to see that this decision led to three very worthy candidates coming forward. I've never met Aris in person but heard only good things about him and his organizational skills. I've met Victor when playing in GTA chess league and later was privileged to be a member of Canadian team under his captain guidance during the Online Olympiad in August, and I think highly of him too. They both play important roles in chess life of Canada and Ontario, and I thank them both for that.

However, for the CFC FIDE Representative position, Vadim is the best candidate in my opinion. He is very active and professional in regard to organizing things, and I know it from my experience of working with him within FIDE. But the most important thing is that he knows his way around FIDE and is always up to date with the latest developments, programs, tournaments, so Canadian chess can benefit from this. I don't think there is any conflict of interest because FIDE's and CFC's interests do not contradict, they coincide, and Vadim will be able to lobby CFC's interests in FIDE for the better of all of us.

[Vadim Tsypin]

Vadim Tsypin
Secretary of the FIDE Management Board.
International Arbiter, International Organizer.
Lifetime CFC member. Lifetime FQE member.

Platform for the Feb 2021 election of the CFC FIDE Representative

Honourable Voting Members,
Dear chess friends and colleagues across Canada:

In compliance with the election procedures published (http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/showthread.php?5572-Special-Meeting-of-Voting-Members-Sunday-February-21-to-Thursday-February-25&p=36016#post36016) by the CFC, I have filed an electoral platform with the CFC Secretary today, February 14. I am privileged to present my position to you here. Please find a PDF document attached.

Since 2018, FIDE was completely reorganized as a modern, transparent, democratic, business-like sports federation, which allowed it to attract reputable Western sponsors. FIDE has a fully funded budget, audited annually by Ernst & Young. Every year - 2019, 2020, 2021 - we process financial aid applications from National Chess Federations, event organizers, seniors, indigent players, women's groups, scholastic associations, and others; we provide the support requested and distribute the corresponding grants. I believe that my being a core member of the FIDE management makes me the best person to advocate for Canada's interests, to help Canadians navigate support / development programs, and to prepare aid applications.

Here are the key challenges that lie ahead for the CFC-FIDE relationship. I pledge to turn my immediate attention to them.

[Vadim Tsypin]

Built on Indigenous lands, Canada is a country striving for national unity: “the true North strong and free”, the most admired country in the world.

The Chess Federation of Canada (CFC) counts its history since 1872 and was one of the FIDE founding members in 1924. Like our great country, our chess federation can prosper to the highest standards, especially given that one of FIDE mission statements is to “strengthen unity of national and regional chess federations throughout the world”.

At present, the Canadian Olympic Committee recognizes the CFC as a National Sport Organization. The CFC is involved with Sports and Tourism Canada largely because of the COC recognition. The CFC President’s hard work pursuing opportunities with Sports and Tourism Canada has led to local community sponsorships of tens of thousands dollars over the last few years. I can assure you, there is much more we can do, much more we can achieve, by working together as one, with one purpose!

All our seniors, all our juniors, all our Grandmasters will continue playing under the Maple Leaf. New synergies will lead to more projects and even to significant revenue growth for the CFC. This is my vision for the most crucial issue in the FIDE-CFC relationship that I will strengthen as a FIDE executive, a CFC Representative, and a proud Canadian.

[Vadim Tsypin]

Information and communication is the key for success in the 21st century. There are significant initiatives and programs at FIDE that positively affect every federation. There are new events, both over-the-board and online, being planned every month. I will ensure a free and complete bi-directional flow of information between FIDE and the Canadian chess public. Never again will we lose an opportunity or miss a deadline. I will regularly inform the CFC Executive, the organizers, coaches and players of any new public announcements.

[Vadim Tsypin]

FIDE is our friend, our mentor, our protector. The FIDE Mission lists as explicit goals the development of chess, strengthening of the national federations, and improving chess players’ social conditions. “GENS UNA SUMUS” is both FIDE’s official motto and the sentiment coming from my heart. We are to be One Family again!

FIDE actually finances national chess federations and the specific projects they put forward. The financing is done through direct bilateral agreements, through the FIDE Development fund, and through the funding that FIDE allocates to its four continents. FIDE has committed to the long-term funding of national federations through sustainable corporate sponsorship.

I will make sure that Canada is included in programs offered by FIDE. Funding might be available for club incorporation, for chess equipment purchases, for event organization and participation, for player training / coach hiring, for arbiter development. There are significant opportunities available through the FIDE Chess in Schools program. The objective of Chess in Schools is not to raise professional players but, rather, to provide young generations with a learning tool that would advance their social and educational development.

I will help the CFC to prepare and submit all program applications in a professional and timely way. Whenever clubs, players or organizers are eligible to apply individually, I will help any Canadian to understand FIDE requirements and to prepare a competitive application. It was a pleasure for me already to help an iconic Canadian event to submit an application for a grant under the FIDE Aid for Open Tournaments program earlier this month.

[Vadim Tsypin]

I will facilitate the advancement of Canadian players, trainers, and arbiters and will advocate for them tirelessly. The Canadian federation and its FIDE Representative shall firmly support any CFC member in their interactions with FIDE, be it title applications for our players / coaches / arbiters, tournament participation requests, arbiter appointments. The CFC FIDE Representative shall be proactive, liaising with FIDE bodies and doing everything appropriate to advance Canadian causes.

At the 2020 FIDE World Online Youth Championship, one of the most brilliant Canadian young players stumbled during the preliminary stage and didn’t qualify for the finals. I knew that the organizers - FIDE itself – had a wild card that they could use at their discretion. I picked up the phone, called a FIDE Vice-President who supervised the competition, and put together a case for assigning the wild card to this young Canadian, given their distinguished track record in over-the-board continental competitions. My arguments were found solid and our player received the wild card, becoming one of 16 to compete in the final. This is an example of efficient and ethical advocacy that I will continue.

[Vadim Tsypin]

For the purposes of organizing the World Championship Cycle and to facilitate awarding player titles, FIDE groups its member countries into sets called “FIDE zones” that are further divided into subzones. There are more than thirty such zones and subzones in FIDE. They would typically group from three to twenty-two countries each.

There are only six FIDE member countries that have their own zones. Here they are, with their respective positions in the Top Federations rating list.


Europe:
1 Russia 2730
5 Ukraine 2665
Asia:
3 China 2702
4 India 2668
The Americas:
2 USA 2713
34 Canada 2534

Yes, the countries that enjoy their own zones and all the perks that come with them are # 1, # 2, # 3, # 4, # 5 – and # 34, Canada! FIDE was very kind to us in this respect and I will strengthen the affinity between the CFC and FIDE so that our country continues to benefit from this arrangement.

Having its own zone allows Canadian players, male and female, to earn norms in competitions on our soil, at home, without crippling travel expenses that are especially painful for up-and-coming juniors and their parents. Having its own zone allows Canadians a shot at direct titles in our home-based Zonal tournaments (the requirements became more severe in recent years but there is always a chance that they can be loosened again). Having its own zone allows Canada to have more places both in the World Cup and in Women’s World Cup.

One of my highest priorities as the CFC FIDE Representative will be to preserve Canada's own zone.

[Vadim Tsypin]

I will establish or strengthen horizontal ties with fellow FIDE Members, other National Chess Federations (NCFs). Decentralization and professional networks is the key in our day and age. My healthy friendly relationships both within FIDE management and with the executives of key chess federation in the Americas, Asia and Europe will allow me to obtain unique opportunities for Canadian players and officials, especially for the young players.

I will continue working tirelessly to leverage my international connections for the benefit of Canadians. One of the achievements I am the most proud of is getting Canadian teenagers invited to participate in an all-expense-paid trip to the 14th edition of the Vladimir Dvorkovich Cup. This high-profile international competition organized by the FIDE President annually in memory of his late father, a renowned International Arbiter, is called an unofficial World Youth Team Championship (the average rating of invited teams is higher than even at the FIDE Youth Olympiad) and is contested by teams from all four FIDE continents.

Thanks to an agreement I was able to reach, in 2019 it was Team Canada rather than Team USA that was invited from the Americas. Thus, 2019 marked the first appearance of Team Canada at this prestigious event. The four Canadian players (2F, 2M) from Fredericton, NB, Ottawa and Windsor, ON, were selected by the CFC in a transparent process. I acted as a captain and personally flew the team halfway around the world, to Aktobe, Kazakhstan, where young Canadian stars experienced a diverse sports and cultural program, establishing lasting friendships with their peers worldwide.

[Vadim Tsypin]

I will work with the CFC Executive, provincial associations, chess organizers, local tourism bureaus and chambers of commerce to bring FIDE events to Canada. There are two major types of FIDE events: summits (a FIDE Congress, an in-person FIDE Council meeting, an in-person Management Board meeting) and competitions (the World and Continental events, including those for Youth, Seniors, and Disabled players). Our federation has licensed International Organizers who are the only people allowed to sign bids for FIDE events. When communities and corporate sponsors support, we shall not hesitate to bid on the World (L1 level) FIDE competitions, starting with some simpler ones.

Canada shall have a more fruitful and mutually beneficial partnership with our continental body, the Confederation of Chess for Americas (CCA). We shall establish a rotation schedule similar to those that already exists for the North America Youth Ch. In this case, Canada will be able to host Panamerican Open, Women’s, Youth, Scholastic, and others.

[Vadim Tsypin]

Canada has great coaches and arbiters who are excellent in passing on knowledge to others. FIDE has a variety of programs where stronger chess countries help developing nations. These programs are financed from the FIDE Development Fund. Of particular interest to Canadian professionals are the help programs for such newly admitted Caribbean nations as St. Lucia, Grenada, Cayman Islands, St. Kitts and Nevis.

I will make sure that Canada participates in these programs so that our coaches and arbiters have a chance to train players and officials in the Caribbean.

[Vadim Tsypin]

The CFC’s daily operations are a labour of love by our great Executive Director Bob Gillanders. Bob is doing a great job, despite being constantly overworked in having to combine essentially several demanding positions: the Executive Director, the Technical Director, The Rating Officer, and the Titles Officer.

As a person responsible for procurement within FIDE, I will share with the CFC the best practices of FIDE’s own offices around the world and those of leading national federations. I will help Bob and the CFC Executive to identify which logistical solutions and software platforms used by our colleagues worldwide might be beneficial for Canada.

[Vadim Tsypin]

I am running for the CFC FIDE Representative in order to serve the Canadian chess community, to become its steward at FIDE, and to provide for its well-being. I will devote all my energy to serving your interests. I truly believe that our big chess family deserves a much better life, and I promise to use all my knowledge, skills and experience to make it happen.

Let’s succeed and prosper together!

[Vadim Tsypin]

One of the many ways FIDE helps people worldwide is through the projects managed by its Social Commission in coordination with other stakeholders.

As we all know, the First FIDE Online World Corporate Chess Championship will be played next weekend (February 19-21). There are 284 teams registered from 78 different countries, for a total 1,467 players.

FIDE doesn't charge an entry fee of any kind for this competition. However, FIDE organized a fundraiser in cooperation with the Softgiving platform. Participating companies are encouraged to donate towards one of three FIDE social projects:

Chess in Education programs for underprivileged children,
Chess for people with Disabilities,
Veteran support program.

Members of the public can contribute as well on a dedicated page:
https://give.softgiving.com/FIDE

[Victor Plotkin]

As part of his campaign, Vadim sent an email to me (!!) with a great offer to publicly support and endorse him, because he is the best candidate for this position.

Maybe I am just an old-fashioned person. Maybe I am still living in the 19th century. Maybe I don't understand modern trends in chess politics. But I don't understand this at all. How could a candidate send this kind of email to another candidate with such a peculiar proposal?

Vadim believes that he is the best candidate... and that may be the case. Vadim believes that he will get overwhelming support in every province... possible as well. However, as a respectful human being he shouldn't send this sort of email to another candidate.

It's like if I were to play chess against Vadim and propose that he resigns in the initial position, before the game even starts. Why? Because I am a better player and will very likely win this game anyway.

CFC chess politics is really funny sometimes.

[Vadim Tsypin]

Dear colleagues, honourable Voting Members:

During the four weeks of the election campaign I had the privilege to reach out, personally and in groups, to more than thirty of you via Zoom, WhatsApp, or phone, and to even more via e-mail. From sea to shining sea, from Charlottetown to Victoria, you kindly shared with me your concerns. Concerns about support for dues-paying rank and file members who play chess at a club level. Concerns about assistance to local organizers. Concerns about fairness in distribution of both CFC flagship events and other marquee events among four major geographical regions of our great country. I answered your questions, provided information and source materials. I was already able to help your important projects on some occasions.

My published program resonated with you, the voters, and with the CFC grassroots. On this very forum, I was humbled to be publicly endorsed by two distinguished members of the Canadian Women’s Olympiad teams, by a captain of a Canadian team playing in the World Corporate Ch., by the best Head of Delegation our World Youth contingents ever knew. The legendary GM Lev Alburt and others endorsed me on their Facebooks, as did some young up-and-coming players whose first steps in chess I was fortunate to nurture a decade ago. I am grateful for your widespread support. I welcome all endorsements, public and private. I call upon every CFC member to join me under a big tent with the Maple Leaf proudly painted on the top.

There is such a wealth of talented, intelligent, hard-working people who devote their time to chess at scholastic, club, and elite levels! Together, united, with the help of FIDE and in partnership with our biggest ally the USCF and other national federations, we can usher in a new golden age for chess in Canada. There is a place for everyone - Aris, Victor, Hal, Mahmud, Egis – for everyone who loves Canadian chess and is willing to put their considerable talents to serve the game we love. Everyone is welcome to do what his skills set allows. I am a consensus builder. Let us combine our efforts and pull together for the prosperity of Canadian chess!

[Aris Marghetis]

As part of his campaign, Vadim sent an email to me (!!) with a great offer to publicly support and endorse him, because he is the best candidate for this position.

Maybe I am just an old-fashioned person. Maybe I am still living in the 19th century. Maybe I don't understand modern trends in chess politics. But I don't understand this at all. How could a candidate send this kind of email to another candidate with such a peculiar proposal?

Vadim believes that he is the best candidate... and that may be the case. Vadim believes that he will get overwhelming support in every province... possible as well. However, as a respectful human being he shouldn't send this sort of email to another candidate.

It's like if I were to play chess against Vadim and propose that he resigns in the initial position, before the game even starts. Why? Because I am a better player and will very likely win this game anyway.

CFC chess politics is really funny sometimes.

I hereby confirm that I also received such an email from Vadim Tsypin.

[Vadim Tsypin]

Dear colleagues:


I will establish or strengthen horizontal ties with fellow FIDE Members, other National Chess Federations (NCFs). Decentralization and professional networks is the key in our day and age. My healthy friendly relationships both within FIDE management and with the executives of key chess federation in the Americas, Asia and Europe will allow me to obtain unique opportunities for Canadian players and officials, especially for the young players.


There are so many intriguing possibilities for online and, eventually, over-the-board matches between players at all levels from Canada and a partner federation: senior players, club-level players, scholastic games, IM/GM norm events. To finance such exchanges, we will not necessarily go looking for partnerships with countries that are rich and powerful (U.K., France, or Japan). Many developing economies have chess funding that exceeds our wildest dreams but might be quite interested in various intangibles that Canada can offer.

I am pleased to direct you to an opinion piece published on the CMA Web site. This article analyzes issues with player development in Canada and draws attention to the positive experiences and government programs in one of rapidly expanding Central Asian economies.

An equivalent of US$ 4 million of annual guaranteed funding from state budget just for scholastic chess – isn’t it fantastic even by North American standards?!

https://chess-math.org/blog/uzbekistan-set-become-world-chess-leader-thanks-presidents-decree

The CFC would benefit greatly from forming horizontal, peer-to-peer relationships with the Chess Federation of Uzbekistan and similar relationships with other rapidly developing chess powers, such as the All-India Chess Federation. Thanks to my already established contacts with federation officials around the world, we shall be able to start working on drafting Memorandums of Understanding right after the election!

[Mahmud Hassain]

As part of his campaign, Vadim sent an email to me (!!) with a great offer to publicly support and endorse him, because he is the best candidate for this position.

Maybe I am just an old-fashioned person. Maybe I am still living in the 19th century. Maybe I don't understand modern trends in chess politics. But I don't understand this at all. How could a candidate send this kind of email to another candidate with such a peculiar proposal?

Vadim believes that he is the best candidate... and that may be the case. Vadim believes that he will get overwhelming support in every province... possible as well. However, as a respectful human being he shouldn't send this sort of email to another candidate.

It's like if I were to play chess against Vadim and propose that he resigns in the initial position, before the game even starts. Why? Because I am a better player and will very likely win this game anyway.

CFC chess politics is really funny sometimes.

Ladies and Gentlemen Voting Members,
For any one who has any ounce of integrity, responsibility and ethics, Vadim is absolutely not qualified to hold neither a voting member nor a CFC delegate. From what I have gathered, his case is over for me.

Vadim is a member of the "CORE MANAGEMENT TEAM of FIDE". Vadim can not represent you, as a Canadian, to FIDE. You can not represent us to "yourself" damn it!!.
Vadim is a leading member of CMA (VP), Clearly competing with CFC in geographical domain (Canada) and the target group (youth). Acting against the best interests of CFC.

Vadim, why are you so adamant that you must/need to hold the following positions simultaneously? Especially when we have others who are willing to stand!
-FIDE Management Team
-VP of CMA
-Voting Member of CFC
-CFC representative to FIDE

Only in dictatorships and Banana Republics this could happen. Therefore, I am pleading with you and urging all of you, the voting members, to disqualify Vadim form any CFC governing position.

Vadim, IS THIS WHY YOU DID NOT INVITE ME, and tens of other voting members, TO YOUR "ZOOM PRESENTATION"?? The CFC is not your house nor is it your fiefdom. You do not own the CFC.

Ladies and Gentlemen Voting Members, please be warned and herby informed that if you do not disqualify Vadim, I will not hesitate to, and I will go public with this. This is shame to Canada, and shame to our federation.

This is my duty and it is YOUR duty as well.

[Sasha Starr]

Ladies and Gentlemen Voting Members,
For any one who has any ounce of integrity, responsibility and eth

Vadim is a member of the "CORE MANAGEMENT TEAM of FIDE". Vadim can not represent you, as a Canadian, to FIDE. You can not represent us to "yourself" damn it!!.
Vadim is a leading member of CMA (VP), Clearly competing with CFC in geographical domain (Canada) and the target group (youth). Acting against the best interests of CFC.

Vadim, why are you so adamant that you must/need to hold the following positions simultaneously? Especially when we have others who are willing to stand!
-FIDE Management Team
-VP of CMA
-Voting Member of CFC
-CFC representative to FIDE

Only in dictatorships and Banana Republics this could happen. Therefore, I am pleading with you and urging all of you, the voting members, to disqualify Vadim form any CFC governing position.

Vadim, IS THIS WHY YOU DID NOT INVITE ME, and tens of other voting members, TO YOUR "ZOOM PRESENTATION"?? The CFC is not your house nor is it your fiefdom. You do not own the CFC.

Ladies and Gentlemen Voting Members, please be warned and herby informed that if you do not disqualify Vadim, I will not hesitate to, and I will go public with this. This is shame to Canada, and shame to our federation.

This is my duty and it is YOUR duty as well.

Dear Mahmud Hassain,
As you've noted Mr. Vadim Tsypin is VP of CMA, VM of CFC and on FIDE Management Team. He has these positions for sometime already. So the case for the disqualification of Vadim you are making now could have been raised at any point in the past, however you are doing it NOW. Why? This is from your post: "Vadim is absolutely not qualified to hold neither a voting member nor a CFC delegate. From what I have gathered, his case is over for me." Lets understand: WHAT exactly have you gathered? And WHEN.
Sasha Starr, VP.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

Ladies and Gentlemen Voting Members, please be warned and herby informed that if you do not disqualify Vadim, I will not hesitate to, and I will go public with this.

Voting members have not any power to disqualify the person from elections. The CFC has not the Nomination Committee what would screen candidates and recommend them for farther elections. As the limit of % for the nomination is very low in the CFC, the person can nominate himself. The voting members can express their opinion and vote.

FYI: This forum is already public. If you want keep matters only to VMs, you need to post in http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?6-CFC-Voting-Members-Discussion

FYI: If you will be not happy how the election proceeded you might go to a court (se NFP Act.)

[Vladimir Drkulec]

Voting members have not any power to disqualify the person from elections. The CFC has not the Nomination Committee what would screen candidates and recommend them for farther elections. As the limit of % for the nomination is very low in the CFC, the person can nominate himself. The voting members can express their opinion and vote.

FYI: This forum is already public. If you want keep matters only to VMs, you need to post in http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?6-CFC-Voting-Members-Discussion

FYI: If you will be not happy how the election proceeded you might go to a court (se NFP Act.)

It is bordering on a breach of fiduciary duty for a member of the board to suggest that someone might go to court on these matters.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

It is bordering on a breach of fiduciary duty for a member of the board to suggest that someone might go to court on these matters.

To inform the member of his "rights" is far from the breach. While it is quite different let's call it a duty of care to have informed members.

[Sasha Starr]

It makes me disturbed somewhat the luck of Mahmud Hassain's reply to my post. However will wait a little longer, I guess...

In his message there are heavy accusations against one candidate out of three, threats to disqualify etc. If it is his opinion that the other two candidates are better then Vadim Tsypin he can by no means vote for one of them, no problem. However he goes ballistic against a candidate who definitely has qualifications and meticulously voiced them here and elsewhere. Furthermore, Mahmud Hassain is not dismissing Vadim's qualifications. He's not even trying to explain what makes the other two candidates the better choices. Instead he's arguing for disqualification of the actually viable candidate! ALL VM "...who has any ounce of integrity, responsibility and eth" should disqualify Vadim Tsypin - but as you know there is not even a mechanism to achieve it! So as a minimum VM who read Mahmud Hassain's post should NOT vote for Vadim! Is that a real Mahmud Hassain message? He goes: "Ladies and Gentlemen Voting Members, please be warned and herby informed that if you do not disqualify Vadim, I will not hesitate to, and I will go public with this. This is shame to Canada, and shame to our federation." It is a very heavy statement including warning and effectively an ultimatum.

That led me to believe that Mahmud Hassain has really gathered something new, unique, and extremely important information regarding Vadim. Will try one more time: Mahmud Hassain, please tell us: WHAT exactly have you gathered? And WHEN.

Sasha Starr, VM.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

463

Tel-Aviv, February 18, 2021

Board of Directors, Chess Federation of Canada
Canadian chess community


Dear chess friends,

As you know, I served with distinction for many years as the FIDE Vice-President and the ranking member of the Commission for World Championships & Olympiads (WCOC). Canada was always a part of our team. I had many wonderful interactions with Mr. Hal Bond who was the Canada delegate and one of the favorites of former President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov and Deputy President Georgios Makropoulos. Mr. Bond always had an ear of the FIDE leadership and was appointed to the most prestigious competitions in his personal capacity as an arbiter. My only regret was that FIDE never organized any competition in Canada nor assisted your federation in any significant way. I salute Mr. Bond for his years of service and I will keep great memories of the conversations that Mr. Makropoulos, he and I held together.

Our team has achieved a lot at FIDE: unified the World Championship cycle, started World Cups and the Grand Prix events, held fantastic Olympiads in Tromso and Baku. We did what we believed was good for chess at the moment. Still, everything in this world has an expiry date. The October 2018 FIDE election was about competing visions for the FIDE future in the 21st century. Mr. Arkady Dvorkovich’s dynamic New Horizons team won resoundingly. Most of us veterans of the previous administration sailed gently into sunset but kept watching the new FIDE’s efforts bringing our noble game to a higher level.

I came across the fact that your federation is about to choose a new FIDE delegate. I do not know the other candidates but I do know Mr. Vadim Tsypin and I believe he will contribute a lot to the world of chess and Canadian chess as well.

The first time I met Vadim Tsypin in person was at the FIDE Congress in Batumi, Georgia, where he distinguished himself as a member of Arkady Dvorkovich’s FIDE Presidential Election campaign. As designated representatives of both candidates, Mr. Tsypin and I served along with Chief Scrutineer Ms. Carol Jarecki (British Virgin Islands) on a vote integrity committee at the FIDE Congress.

Even though we were on opposing sides, I could not help but notice how efficient Vadim was in providing analytics, preparing for the commission hearings, managing and structuring a flow of incoming information. My understanding is that Vadim speaks at least three languages fluently so he was able to reach out to many delegates even across the aisle and to make his mark in several important meetings. All this time, Vadim remained unfailingly polite and courteous. He treats his opponents with utmost respect; he discusses ideas and concepts, never lowering himself to ad hominem attacks. However, I had more than one opportunity to find out that Vadim is an experienced debater who puts forward surgically precise and clinically lethal arguments that prevail over his opponents’ logic.

It was a pleasure for me to work with Ms. Jarecki and Mr. Tsypin on a vote integrity committee (please see photos attached). We completed our work in a professional respectful manner and the results were ratified by both candidates’ campaigns, which closed the page on the 2018 election.

As I keep relations with my friends in FIDE administration, I am well informed of FIDE’s current activities. I see that Vadim is a consummate professional who garners universal respect from colleagues in the chess world. That’s why it was no surprise for anyone that Vadim Tsypin was appointed to a crucial position of the Secretary of the Management Board. Vadim’s role has been important in projects that became hallmarks of the new FIDE, such as elimination of various fees.

As mentioned above, I believe that Mr. Vadim Tsypin will make a perfect Canadian delegate to FIDE.

Sincerely,


Israel Gelfer


My reply:


Dear FIDE Senior Trainer Israel Gelfer,


Thank you, for your endorsement letter in favour of Mr. Vadim Tsypin and for your kind words about Mr. Hal Bond.


I would be remiss if I didn't tell you that I have a well-worn copy of your "Positional Chess Handbook" which has given me many hours of enjoyment and which I suspect will continue to do so for many years into the future. Thank you, for authoring this book.


With warmest regards,



Vladimir Drkulec
President, Chess Federation of Canada

[Victor Itkin]

It is bordering on a breach of fiduciary duty for a member of the board to suggest that someone might go to court on these matters.

Common, Vlad! This is not a suggestion for somebody to go to the court. Egis is just explaining voting procedure in CFC.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

Common, Vlad! This is not a suggestion for somebody to go to the court. Egis is just explaining voting procedure in CFC.




FYI: If you will be not happy how the election proceeded you might go to a court (se NFP Act.)

In this case we have to look at what was said and not what we wish had been said.

[Christopher Mallon]

This seems to be a playbook for you Vlad.

- Use people as long as they are useful for you
- Attack them and/or burn them out as soon as they aren't
- Threaten "The CFC will lose NFP status!" anytime someone suggests something you don't like.
- Completely ignore anytime someone suggests - with quotes from the NFP act - that you are doing/suggesting something that might breach the rules.

So now it seems you've turned most of the existing executive against you - here you are arguing in public with the VP - so you've apparently decided to stack the executive with your own friends?

And really, who CARES if someone from Israel likes one candidate over another? Why would you even bother to post such a thing, much less ask for a letter of recommendation? What do you think the reaction in Israel would be if someone here started trying to meddle in elections over there?

[Vladimir Drkulec]

Ladies and Gentlemen Voting Members,
For any one who has any ounce of integrity, responsibility and ethics, Vadim is absolutely not qualified to hold neither a voting member nor a CFC delegate. From what I have gathered, his case is over for me.

Setting aside your double negative and grammatical errors it really appears to me that you do not know what those words :"integrity, responsibility and ethics" mean. You are accusing voting members who do not share your opinion of lacking those qualities.



Vadim is a member of the "CORE MANAGEMENT TEAM of FIDE". Vadim can not represent you, as a Canadian, to FIDE. You can not represent us to "yourself" damn it!!.

Tell that to Gilbert Perez. After launching efforts with Hal Bond, I opened a parallel track with Vadim Tsypin and asked him if we could get anything done for Gilbert in order to allow him to achieve his dream of representing Canada in the Online Olympiad for Disabled players. Hal said that there wasn't much that could be done. Vadim suggested how we might get the Philippines Chess Federation to waive their portion of the fees. Initially that didn't work. Right about this time Hal Bond said there was nothing that could be done. Vadim called up the delegate from the Philippines and asked him to waive the fees. They kindly agreed to waive their portion of the fee. Then Vadim shepherded our request for a fee waiver and transfer through the Verification Commission and the Commission for Disabled Players and then it reached the FIDE management board.

Re: Update on Gilbert Perez's transfer
Vadim I. Tsypin

Thu 2020-10-08 10:18 AM

Good morning Vlad,


Thanks a lot for your kind words. The reason I got involved in chess, first as a parent, then as a volunteer, then as a professional, was to help people, especially those who require support: youth, seniors, non-seeing. When you told me about this disabled player's plight, it touched me profoundly. Glad that I was able to do my small part.


So - the news is great albeit anticlimactic. ;-) The just-completed Management Board meeting approved the CFC request, waived all fees due to FIDE, instructed appropriate bodies to accomplish the transfer. Congratulations!


As usual, it will take some time for me to prepare the official texts of all decisions and to send them to involved parties. The Canadian item was near the end of the agenda but I hope to send you the official document on - or even by - Friday. Once you receive it, you can tell the player and the CFC Executive when you believe appropriate. For now, please forward me a package of Gilbert Perez' transfer documents that he sent to the CFC, I will try to deliver it to the Elista office before *their* Friday morning then. :)


Very happy,


--
V.T.




On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:33 PM Vladimir Drkulec wrote:


Hello Vadim,


Thanks for your help on this matter.


I sent Hal Bond the details of this situation, about the same time that I contacted you. By the time you got the Philippine rep to waive the fee, Hal was saying that there was nothing that could be done. When we finally reach the end of this process and Gilbert can play on our team, I intend to tell this story and the lessons that it shows. I intend to be profusely thankful to you and the role that you played in husbanding this to a successful conclusion.


With warmest regards,


Vlad


From: Vadim I. Tsypin <vadim.tsypin@gmail.com>
Sent: October 5, 2020 10:24 PM
To: Vladimir Drkulec <vdrkulec@hotmail.com>
Subject: Update on Gilbert Perez's transfer

Good evening Vlad,


No big news, everything proceeds orderly through the gears. As planned, DIS and QC gave their formal written support to Canada's official request, so I added this item to the agenda of this week's Management Board meeting. Will notify you immediately once it's discussed.


There shall be no obstacles, and the good thing is that by now all decision-makers for the Paralympiad are aware of and sympathetic to Mr. Perez's situation, so there is little danger he would "fall through the cracks" because of deadlines. We'll just need to submit the document package quickly once the MB takes a decision.


Kind regards,


--
V.T.
















Vadim is a leading member of CMA (VP), Clearly competing with CFC in geographical domain (Canada) and the target group (youth). Acting against the best interests of CFC.

You keep saying this. How is the CMA competing with the CFC? They are introducing children to chess in a limited number of cities. I don't think they are even the largest group that teaches chess in Canada. Some of those children go on to play in CFC events and tournaments. They are our farm team that feeds the system. They are one of several. Our focus is on tournament players. Their focus is on children. They are part of our infrastructure. I would guess that many voting members have some connection to the CMA having run tournaments for them and the kids. I would guess that any voting member involved in chess training of children has worked with the CMA.



Vadim, why are you so adamant that you must/need to hold the following positions simultaneously? Especially when we have others who are willing to stand!
-FIDE Management Team
-VP of CMA
-Voting Member of CFC
-CFC representative to FIDE

Only in dictatorships and Banana Republics this could happen. Therefore, I am pleading with you and urging all of you, the voting members, to disqualify Vadim form any CFC governing position.

We certainly wouldn't want him to abuse his authority by helping other Canadians like Gilbert Perez through the maze of the FIDE process.



Vadim, IS THIS WHY YOU DID NOT INVITE ME, and tens of other voting members, TO YOUR "ZOOM PRESENTATION"??

I am pretty sure that was because the contact information for you was incorrect and was bouncing back.



The CFC is not your house nor is it your fiefdom. You do not own the CFC.

Non sequitur.




Ladies and Gentlemen Voting Members, please be warned and herby informed that if you do not disqualify Vadim, I will not hesitate to, and I will go public with this. This is shame to Canada, and shame to our federation.

This is my duty and it is YOUR duty as well.

Go public with what? Go public to whom? A shame how?

[Michael Barron]

Dear chess friends,

I got an invitation to chess show which will be aired on Saturday, February 20, at 3 pm EST and want to share it with you all:

Here is a link to the Youtube's upcoming Saturday's chess show.
View Link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFhwjmxNhbs

I asked Sasha why he didn't invite all 3 candidates and got the following reply:

"I've spoken to all three candidates for the post of CFCs FIDE Representative.

As you know I have a Chess Show on IBM TV every Saturday at 3 PM. And thought that it would be very interesting to invite all three candidates to participate in this show with links sent to all voting members so everyone could make up his/her minds based on the open debates' format, and being able to send questions to all and any candidate.

I've informed all that to create a poster and links for the show, I need information and pictures of each candidate no later than Tuesday evening.

Regrettably only one candidate, Vadim Tsypin, has agreed to participate in the program and sent me a picture. Aris Marghetis on the other hand has ignored my invitation and hasn't even replied, while Victor Plotkin has refused to participate unless all three candidates would show up. Sorry, I can't comply with Victor's condition for an obvious reason.

Will send you the YouTube link in the next day or two. Please send me any questions from you or other VMs to Vadim.
"

Thankfully, after some tricks I was able to upload a poster :

464


Hopefully, this show could help us to make informed decision during coming meeting.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

Aris is dealing with some family health issues, so that likely contributed to him not being able to attend the debate.

[Aris Marghetis]

Aris is dealing with some family health issues, so that likely contributed to him not being able to attend the debate.

Which is exactly what I explained to Sasha when WE SPOKE ON THE PHONE EARLIER THAT DAY. How that qualifies as not replying, I don't know. To his credit, Sasha then wished me and my family well. Michael, I'm disappointed you chose to post that without clarification on the factually incorrect Aris-never-replied. Come on man.

[Sasha Starr]

Aris,

Please allow me to comment on your statement "factually incorrect Aris-never-replied" remark.

During our phone conversation Tuesday morning I've outlined to you my goal: to have a chess show with all 3 candidates facing questions from the panelists which includes well known chess personalities.
Furthermore, the candidates could've asked each other any questions regarding their programs, related experience, etc. so Voting Members could have an additional source of info helping them making intelligent choice.

During our phone conversation I've requested that in case you are moving forward with your participation you would had to commit yourself for 1 hour from 3 to 4 PM on Saturday and email me your picture. I've explained that I needed your answer by Tuesday evening because on Wednesday I had to create the poster and links for the program. By Tuesday evening I haven't heard from you. At about 8 PM on Tuesday Michael Barron sent you an email with cc to me asking you to contact me asap. However by the end of Tuesday you haven't replied. That was an indication that you've declined my invitation due to either your unwillingness to participate in the show or more likely because of your inability to make it due to the family health issues. Next day you've clarified this issue (family health) and I wished you and your family well.
So you think that your call was a reply. However what I meant was your non reply via email to my invitation by Tuesday evening.

Again, hopefully there will be other opportunities. Again, best wishes to you and your family. Stay well, keep safe.

Sasha Starr, VM.

[Christopher Mallon]

Aris,

Please allow me to comment on your statement "factually incorrect Aris-never-replied" remark.

During our phone conversation Tuesday morning I've outlined to you my goal: to have a chess show with all 3 candidates facing questions from the panelists which includes well known chess personalities.
Furthermore, the candidates could've asked each other any questions regarding their programs, related experience, etc. so Voting Members could have an additional source of info helping them making intelligent choice.

During our phone conversation I've requested that in case you are moving forward with your participation you would had to commit yourself for 1 hour from 3 to 4 PM on Saturday and email me your picture. I've explained that I needed your answer by Tuesday evening because on Wednesday I had to create the poster and links for the program. By Tuesday evening I haven't heard from you. I meant that you haven't replied to my invitation. That was an indication that you've declined my invitation due to either your unwillingness to do so or more likely because of your inability to make it due to the family health issues. Next day you've clarified this issue (family health) and I wished you and your family well.
So you think that your call was a reply. However what I meant was your non reply to my invitation to the chess show by Tuesday evening.

This explanation actually makes you look worse. So you were already aware of his family health issues at the time it went public, and still tried to mislead everyone with the statement that he ignored your invitation, which he obviously did not do since you spoke to him on the phone.

[Sasha Starr]

Christopher,
Thank you for your comments. However you are wrong. There is no explanation of any kind making me look worse as you've proposed. Also I'm not misleading anyone.
I've explained Aris that I need his reply in writing with his picture by the end of Tuesday. If he would've told me in the morning that he is not going to participate I would've not asked him for the confirming email. Got it? And just be careful accusing me with "misleading everyone".

[Christopher Mallon]

Christopher,
Thank you for your comments. However you are wrong. There is no explanation of any kind making me look worse as you've proposed. Also I'm not misleading anyone.
I've explained Aris that I need his reply in writing with his picture by the end of Tuesday. If he would've told me in the morning that he is not going to participate I would've not asked him for the confirming email. Got it? And just be careful accusing me with "misleading everyone".


Sasha,

Your invitation went public on Thursday evening. By your own admission, you spoke to Aris on Tuesday (you were not ignored!) and did not receive a reply by the deadline. By Wednesday you were aware for the reason behind this, yet on Thursday evening you are having a public invitation sent out to who knows how big of a mailing list where you are still stating that Aris ignored your invitation. How is that not misleading?

So originally, it could have been that you misspoke. However, now it is clear that you did this intentionally. That is why I said your explanation made you look worse.

[Sasha Starr]

Wait a sec. It is true that I knew by Tuesday evening about health issues in Aris family.

But at the same time I had a Wednesday's deadline to prepare the title of the show, list of participants, their pictures, create links and so on.

It was my intention to have all three candidates on the show. And I've spoken to all of them. Aris was noncommittal during our phone call, that's why I've explained to him that if he decided to go ahead with the show I would need his commitment in writing with his picture by Tuesday evening. To make it clear Michael Barron reminded him to send me email as well (around 8 PM).

When I've said that I was ignored I meant that by Tuesday night I was expecting Aris' email advising me one way or another about Aris' intentions about the show. The poster was created on Wednesday and went public on Thursday. To make the long story short I haven't got Aris' email by Tuesday evening. Had to proceed anyway. Were there any options then? Please explain. One more thing. What is it I did intentionally according to you? Need you to explain.

Sasha Starr, a VM.

[Victor Itkin]

Christopher,
Thank you for your comments. However you are wrong. There is no explanation of any kind making me look worse as you've proposed. Also I'm not misleading anyone.
I've explained Aris that I need his reply in writing with his picture by the end of Tuesday. If he would've told me in the morning that he is not going to participate I would've not asked him for the confirming email. Got it? And just be careful accusing me with "misleading everyone".

To me it looks that Christopher is correct here.

[Sasha Starr]

Christopher is correct? It looks to you? Really! So is Karl Marx! LOL!

[Victor Itkin]

Christopher is correct? It looks to you? Really! So is Karl Marx! LOL!

This is not ChessTalk. Trolling is not welcome here.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

I have known Victor for many years, not just as a fierce opponent over the chess board, but also as an exceptionally decent human being; and I firmly believe that he would be a very strong FIDE Representative for the CFC.
How would I describe Victor Plotkin? Here goes …




Always has the best interests of chess and all chess players at heart.
Possesses a great talent for hard work.
Has a lot of international knowledge & experience.
An excellent practical problem solver.
A straight arrow; a truth seeker.
A long-term strategic thinker; patient and determined.
Confident and courageous, but also humble.
Gets along very well with others; likes people. Balanced, fair and succinct.
Open minded; a learner.
A true sportsman with impeccable manners. A measured optimist.


These are the reasons I believe that Victor is an ideal candidate to start filling Hal Bond’s very large shoes.


Sincerely,

David Filipovich


I have known David since we were both in our teens. I have posted this because the delays in getting approved for posting did not allow this to take place in a timely manner. David is well known as a Toronto area master who has played in many Canadian Closed tournaments. Most people from the Toronto area are quite familiar with him. Nice guy and a great example for our younger players to emulate.

[Sasha Starr]

Ladies and Gentlemen Voting Members,
For any one who has any ounce of integrity, responsibility and ethics, Vadim is absolutely not qualified to hold neither a voting member nor a CFC delegate. From what I have gathered, his case is over for me.

Vadim is a member of the "CORE MANAGEMENT TEAM of FIDE". Vadim can not represent you, as a Canadian, to FIDE. You can not represent us to "yourself" damn it!!.
Vadim is a leading member of CMA (VP), Clearly competing with CFC in geographical domain (Canada) and the target group (youth). Acting against the best interests of CFC.

Vadim, why are you so adamant that you must/need to hold the following positions simultaneously? Especially when we have others who are willing to stand!
-FIDE Management Team
-VP of CMA
-Voting Member of CFC
-CFC representative to FIDE

Only in dictatorships and Banana Republics this could happen. Therefore, I am pleading with you and urging all of you, the voting members, to disqualify Vadim form any CFC governing position.

Vadim, IS THIS WHY YOU DID NOT INVITE ME, and tens of other voting members, TO YOUR "ZOOM PRESENTATION"?? The CFC is not your house nor is it your fiefdom. You do not own the CFC.

Ladies and Gentlemen Voting Members, please be warned and herby informed that if you do not disqualify Vadim, I will not hesitate to, and I will go public with this. This is shame to Canada, and shame to our federation.

This is my duty and it is YOUR duty as well.

I was asking Mahmud Hassain a few times to explain what he's gathered about Vadim Tsypin which led him to such a negative post. The absence of his reply speaks by itself. So I'm trying to understand his motives. Obvious question is who are possible beneficiaries of his post. The answer is not terribly difficult: remaining two candidates. And I'm surprised that so far they haven't commented on this horrendous message. In fact it is alarming to think that they are in agreement with it? Or maybe even somehow associated with it? Hope not. Therefore I'm kindly asking both Aris and Victor to condemn Mahmud Hassain's message forthwith.
Sasha Starr, VM.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

I was asking Mahmud Hassain a few times to explain what he's gathered about Vadim Tsypin which led him to such a negative post. The absence of his reply speaks by itself.

Sasha, you shall not expect everyone to answer your question the next minute.

I would suggest to talk with the first source - Hal Bond.

[Sasha Starr]

Hal Bond??? What does he have to do with all this???
No, I don't expect the answer for any question the next minute. I've asked Mahmud Hassain my question more then 24 hours ago.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

The forum has issues with approving new forum users. Some of those users want to post support for candidates here.

If anyone need to post immediately without waiting the final approval, within a reasonable time frame I can help with that. My email is on the CFC website https://www.chess.ca/en/cfc/personnel
Vlad has already posted one request as well.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

Hal Bond??? What does he have to do with all this???

Sasha, I wrote already - "with the first source"

[Sasha Starr]

Sasha, you shall not expect everyone to answer your question the next minute.

I would suggest to talk with the first source - Hal Bond.

Hal Bond! Any comments? Are you in agreement with Mahmud Hassain's post? Looking forward to hear from you!
Sasha Starr VM.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

I was asking Mahmud Hassain a few times to explain what he's gathered about Vadim Tsypin which led him to such a negative post. The absence of his reply speaks by itself. So I'm trying to understand his motives. Obvious question is who are possible beneficiaries of his post. The answer is not terribly difficult: remaining two candidates. And I'm surprised that so far they haven't commented on this horrendous message. In fact it is alarming to think that they are in agreement with it? Or maybe even somehow associated with it? Hope not. Therefore I'm kindly asking both Aris and Victor to condemn Mahmud Hassain's message forthwith.
Sasha Starr, VM.

I do not believe that either Victor Plotkin or Aris Marghetis are tied to this post in any way. There is a ghostly colossus whose name Egis has invoked who Mahmud is likely a proxy for. I don't think we should go down that route as it has been a source of much division and turmoil already.

[Sasha Starr]

Agree, and this is exactly why I wanted Victor Plotkin and Aris Marghetis to openly disassociate themselves from this garbage. Full stop. Period.
Which would leave our friends, Mahmud and his mentor(s) alone.
On the other hand, they (Aris and Victor) could be seen as benefactors (who else?) of above mentioned garbage. Do they really need it?

[Francis Rodrigues]

I do not believe that either Victor Plotkin or Aris Marghetis are tied to this post in any way. There is a ghostly colossus whose name Egis has invoked who Mahmud is likely a proxy for. I don't think we should go down that route as it has been a source of much division and turmoil already.

I almost thought you mentioned "ghastly colossus'......
Dracula on a Friday! Sounds quaintly Scarlet Pimpernel:)

Question: If 'Mr. Hussain' is indeed a sock-puppet,
how did he get to be a CFC voting member, and more...
...stand against the incumbent President? Surely
there is a verification process?

I'm not seeing any of the 'transparency' he promised
Vlad in his concession speech, which admittedly is
couched in a much different metaphor than the
'banana republic' language of his phantom post!

Meanwhile, with a couple of days to go, I have a few
gentle questions for the 3 Rep candidates - now that
the Arab Spring has finally come to this position!

Stay tuned folks!

[Vladimir Drkulec]

To start I would like to publicly acknowledge and thank Hal Bond for all his hard over the years in his role as Canada's FIDE rep. His efforts on the international scene on behalf of the CFC as an organization and for Canada's players as individuals are legion and should be applauded. On a personal level I've appreciated and benefited from his work for chess here at home (with the successful Guelph tournaments) as well as numerous conversations on his approaches to resolving international issues, and I sincerely hope that after his well-deserved rest there will be further opportunities for Hal within the Canadian chess community.

I am writing today in support of Victor Plotkin for the open FIDE Rep position. Victor has posted his resume on this site and you can go to it to get a picture of his life outside of chess - successful businessman and a happy family man (chess family man - all the kids play!). Through his varied life experiences Victor would bring a real international perspective to his duties as FIDE Rep.

I would like to focus on Victor within the chess world and how this experience would enhance his work in the position of FIDE Rep. Critical for success in this role is an understanding of the needs of the Canadian chess organization and Canadian chess players and the ability to diplomatically articulate these to FIDE. Amongst the current candidates I believe Victor has the proper balance in experience between player and administrator to allow him to build the necessary relationships to fulfill this role at the highest level.

As a active player he is one of the top players in Canada; within the seniors ranks he is at the very top. Through playing in tournaments across the country over the past 20 years he has made numerous connections at the grass-roots level; and his easy and open demeanor has ensured that he has remained approachable by all. In the last decade he has also increased his International participation - Chicago, Philadelphia, Gibraltar, Reykjavik and Bled are only some of the tournaments over the years, and I have experienced first hand at these tournaments the width and breadth of international relationships he has developed during this process and the regard by which he is held by organizers and participants alike.

Aside from playing Victor has also played an important role in helping organize and captaining the Canadian senior team; captioning the Canadian Olympic Team at several Olympics; coaching several junior teams both in Canadian and international competitions - all of which have all provided greater understanding of the needs of the players (be they juniors, elite players or seniors) as well as additional opportunities for the international relationships and connections that are important for the FIDE Rep to cultivate if they are to do their job properly.

Throughout the roughly 20 years I have known and competed against Victor I have found him to be a very decent, trustworthy, extremely hard-working and a man who has the best interests of Canadian chess at heart. His comprehensive experience in the Canadian chess community over the past 20 years makes him an excellent candidate for the position of FIDE Rep, and I would ask for your consideration in this matter.

Thanks everyone,

Mike



Michael Dougherty is another player that I have known since we were both teenagers. He is often seen in the company of David Filipovich with whom he often travels to tournaments. Both Michael and David have beaten me brutally over the board a number of times over the years though occasionally I manage to score the occasional point or half point if I am playing particularly well. Michael is also a well-respected Toronto area master who I have seen and played often over the years in Ontario based chess events. Also a good guy.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

Agree, and this is exactly why I wanted Victor Plotkin and Aris Marghetis to openly disassociate themselves from this garbage. Full stop. Period.
Which would leave our friends, Mahmud and his mentor(s) alone.
On the other hand, they (Aris and Victor) could be seen as benefactors (who else?) of above mentioned garbage. Do they really need it?

A paper tiger that is easily and quickly burned to ashes benefits no one.

I am not sure of the game being played here. It is not chess. Perhaps a game of trolling.

[Francis Rodrigues]

The Fide Rep is our international Ambassador. Fide is
our Mater and Pater. The Fide Rep is our direct channel
to Fide largesse - Chess nutrition for our whole country!

Inherent in this are funded international assignments for
our international arbiters, top players, officials, etc.,
visiting coaching programs by top grandmasters for our
top players, funding for country-wide scholastic programs,
teaching-staff as well as teaching materials, funding for
sections or legs of international tournaments, zonals, to
be held in Canada, funding for international arbiter/organizer
training seminars, travel scholarships for our own masters
to Third World countries, etc., etc, I could go on and on......

Like any large family, Fide has it's flaws and pimples.
But, if you have your Father's ear, you can get a lot done.

It appears from all the programs I listed above Canada has
sadly benefitted from almost none of them over the last dozen
years, maybe for one reason or another. Hey, nobody's perfect!

To give an example - every federation tries to get as many
international assignments every year for it's teams of
international arbiters. Canada has over 3 dozen International
Arbiters - over the last decade it seems only 1 Canadian
international arbiter (and latterly his associate) have done
All international assignments including World Championships,
Olympiads, etc. Perhaps our Rep could find nobody else?:)

I have personally made it my mission to promote and assist
more Canadians achieve International Arbiter titles - at
least half a dozen have already attained Fide Arbiter titles!

Now here you are -
Just a few gentle questions for our 3 wonderful Rep candidates:

1. Will our International Arbiters finally start getting
international assignments, after the last barren decade?

2. Will scholastic assistance from Fide be made a priority
for our Canadian children country-wide? Faculty and materials?

3. We have budding young Canadian authors - Razvan Preotu, Raja
Panjwani,Michael Song, the Doknjas brothers, etc - would Fide/
CACDEC funding be available (as in the past), to bulk purchase
and distribute their publications to many countries, as well as
subsidize new young authors? Or am I just dreaming in technicolor?

4. Will we see more Fide initiatives for tournaments in Canada?

5. Will we see more arbiter & scholastic initiatives in Canada?

6. Do you have the ear of the top echelon?

7. Do you really have the time to promote Canada's interests?

Without excellent networking, filament connections, it will be
a very hard grind to achieve any of the above. Fide is a vastly
political body - I know! - it will be futile to imagine you
can change Canada's fortunes overnight - particularly if you
also have another job/business/calling occupying your atention!

The candidate who answers these questions honestly, is your man!

[Sasha Starr]

Well done, Francis!

Tomorrow's Chess Show on IBM TV is believed to be the Grandmother of ALL Chess Shows! LOL!
And all three candidates could've had the opportunity to answer all your questions if were willing, able and ready...
However we'll have a fantastic cast: GM Mihail Marin with his wife, a talented artist and chess player, Prof. Kenneth Regan and our own Vadim Tsypin!

Enjoy, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFhwjmxNhbs broadcast starts at 3 PM, if unavailable - see recorded version using the same link!

Sasha Starr, VM.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

Tell that to Gilbert Perez. After launching efforts with Hal Bond, I opened a parallel track with Vadim Tsypin and asked him if we could get anything done for Gilbert in order to allow him to achieve his dream of representing Canada in the Online Olympiad for Disabled players. Hal said that there wasn't much that could be done. Vadim suggested how we might get the Philippines Chess Federation to waive their portion of the fees. Initially that didn't work.

Can you tell us what kind of fees Philippines CF wanted?

Transfer is done according to: https://handbook.fide.com/chapter/B042018
B. Permanent Commissions / 04. Registration, Transfer & Rules of Eligibility for Player / Transfer Regulations & Rules of Eligibility for Players (valid from July 1, 2018 till November 30, 2020

As I see the compensation to the older fed is required only for >2100 players. GP is only ~1800.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

Ahem... Election thread... We're getting a bit into the weeds here.

[Lloyd Lombard]

1. As noted by Sasha and others, this should be a forum for intelligent, well-mannered, sober deliberations regarding chess and chess-related issues. There is "no" reason for intelligent people to attempt to defile other people. Please, simply make your point, argue it, and let others agree or disagree. As noted above, this is a public forum and we want the chess community to have a sense that as chess organizers, that we have their interests at heart. I learned "many" years ago that not everyone will agree with you.
2. The legal application of "Conflict of Interest" will be decided by the organization's legislation / Bylaws or "Conflict of Interest Policy", in this case, Chapter 03, paragraph 8 of FIDE"s Bylaws states: "8. FIDE officials may not simultaneously hold another position within the organisation that creates a conflict of interest." On a "very" quick review, this is all I could find on the subject. In my view, this does not prevent any FIDE Official from being representative of the CFC as in my view, being the CFC Representative does not equate to holding a "position within the organisation."

As noted above, we are extremely fortunate to have 3 very competent people interested in the position. I'm afraid I don't have the pleasure of personally knowing any or all of them except for the information I've been provided in the past two weeks. As this point, I would put my support towards Vadim however hold out to be persuaded otherwise until the time of the final vote.

My thoughts, and all the best to the three candidates,

Lloyd

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

2. The legal application of "Conflict of Interest" will be decided by the organization's legislation / Bylaws or "Conflict of Interest Policy", in this case, Chapter 03, paragraph 8 of FIDE"s Bylaws states: "8. FIDE officials may not simultaneously hold another position within the organisation that creates a conflict of interest." On a "very" quick review, this is all I could find on the subject. In my view, this does not prevent any FIDE Official from being representative of the CFC as in my view, being the CFC Representative does not equate to holding a "position within the organisation."Lloyd

The potential conflict of interest will arise with Vadim Tsypin in the FIDE organization if elected. The CFC FIDE Representative becomes the FIDE Zonal President (that's a FIDE official), while currently VT occupies these positions at FIDE " Secretary of the FIDE MB / Deputy Head of the TAD", sometimes shows up as a "President Adviser".

[Vadim Tsypin]

1. As noted by Sasha and others, this should be a forum for intelligent, well-mannered, sober deliberations regarding chess and chess-related issues. There is "no" reason for intelligent people to attempt to defile other people. Please, simply make your point, argue it, and let others agree or disagree. As noted above, this is a public forum and we want the chess community to have a sense that as chess organizers, that we have their interests at heart. I learned "many" years ago that not everyone will agree with you.
2. The legal application of "Conflict of Interest" will be decided by the organization's legislation / Bylaws or "Conflict of Interest Policy", in this case, Chapter 03, paragraph 8 of FIDE"s Bylaws states: "8. FIDE officials may not simultaneously hold another position within the organisation that creates a conflict of interest." On a "very" quick review, this is all I could find on the subject. In my view, this does not prevent any FIDE Official from being representative of the CFC as in my view, being the CFC Representative does not equate to holding a "position within the organisation."

As noted above, we are extremely fortunate to have 3 very competent people interested in the position. I'm afraid I don't have the pleasure of personally knowing any or all of them except for the information I've been provided in the past two weeks. As this point, I would put my support towards Vadim however hold out to be persuaded otherwise until the time of the final vote.

My thoughts, and all the best to the three candidates,

Lloyd

Thank you so much Lloyd for your kind words and for your legal analysis.

You are a real gentleman who remains remarkably humble in public despite your multiple accomplishments in so many fields. Please allow me to share with our colleagues that you had a long and distinguished career in public service (https://www.canadianlawlist.com/listingdetail/contact/lloyd-lombard-596985/) and you certainly have professional credentials to weigh in on such matters.

[Vadim Tsypin]

The potential conflict of interest will arise with Vadim Tsypin in the FIDE organization if elected. The CFC FIDE Representative becomes the FIDE Zonal President (that's a FIDE official), while currently VT occupies these positions at FIDE " Secretary of the FIDE MB / Deputy Head of the TAD", sometimes shows up as a "President Adviser".

For the benefit of our colleagues who are just coming to this entertaining discussion, I will reproduce in full my February 09 post (http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/showthread.php?5582-CFC-FIDE-Representative-election-Feb-2021&p=36180#post36180).

[Vadim Tsypin]

For the benefit of our colleagues who are just coming to this entertaining discussion, I will reproduce in full my February 09 post (http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/showthread.php?5582-CFC-FIDE-Representative-election-Feb-2021&p=36180#post36180).


Hi Vadim,

Thank you for putting your name forward and thank you for disclosing that you are "a core member of the new FIDE management team". Not withstanding your claimed chess activities, I have three questions for you.

Hello Mahmud,

I am pleased to see your keen interest in the CFC FIDE Representative election. For the Voting Members’ benefit, I am always glad to answer questions that are asked in a polite manner. I am confident that this discussion will open the eyes of the Canadian chess public. A constructive dialog and evidence-based verified information will help Canadians to learn the truth about new FIDE, including the new structure codified in the FIDE Charter adopted at the Extraordinary General Assembly in Abu Dhabi on February 28, 2020.



1- Does not this disqualify you from representing Canada? To my mind, you are clearly in a conflict of interest position. This should be clear to you and to the voting members. So, which hat will you be wearing and which interest will you be advancing? FIDE or CFC?


The answer is simple and straightforward – it doesn’t. FIDE unites 195 National Chess Federations (NCFs). FIDE and the NCFs have shared and aligned interests; they are not on the opposing sides. The FIDE Mission spelled out in the new Charter makes development of chess and strengthening the national federations FIDE’s explicit goals. Improving chess players’ social conditions and well-being is yet another area where FIDE and NCFs work hand in hand.

A layperson that is not experienced in chess governance and international affairs might be surprised to learn that FIDE actually finances the national chess federations and the specific projects they put forward. The financing is done through the direct FIDE-NCF agreement, through the FIDE Development fund and through the funding that FIDE allocates to its four continents.

Each and every person working at FIDE – be it in a paid / unpaid Commission position, an appointed FIDE Council position, or an appointed management team position – remains a patriot, a representative of their national federation, and an efficient lobbyist for the country whose flag she or he is honoured to wear on their sleeve.

I suggest that anyone interested in this issue studies the FIDE Charter which specifically addresses the dual role of those FIDE Council members who are official representatives (delegates) for their federations. Similar provisions welcome participation of Member Federations’ representatives in other FIDE bodies.

The FIDE Council is “a strategic and oversight FIDE body with law-making and executive functions.” Some of the people appointed by the FIDE President to the Council, like my dear friends and colleagues Jiangchuan Ye and Gulkiz Tulay, are also the official FIDE representatives (delegates) from their respective countries, China and Turkey, and they work tirelessly to provide opportunities such as tournaments, seminars, player development for their home countries.

The FIDE Management Board is “the executive, operational and administrative body that assists the President in the day-to-day management of FIDE activities.” We are eleven (11) people appointed personally by the FIDE President and approved by the Council. This is the body that “manages ordinary activities and resources; coordinates current activities of officials, Commissions, offices and employees; provides draft budget; supervises implementation of the budget; approves contracts.”

Several members of the FIDE Management Board who are the official FIDE representatives (delegates) from their respective countries.

GM Victor Bologan, FIDE Executive Director, is a delegate for Moldova.
GM Mohd Al-Mudahka, FIDE International Director, is a delegate for Qatar.
IO Berik Balgabaev, Advisor to the FIDE President, is a delegate for Kazakhstan.


They have made their respective federations very active in FIDE affairs and achieved many agreements that were mutually beneficial for FIDE and those countries.

I am privileged to work daily side-by-side with all these above-mentioned esteemed friends and colleagues, as well as many other FIDE officials who represent their countries in a dignified and highly efficient manner, such as FIDE Council General Secretary Enyonam Sewa “Noël” Fumey (delegate from Togo), FIDE Vice-President Michael Khodarkovsky (delegate for the United States of America), FIDE Vice-President Anastasia Sorokina (delegate for Belarus), FIDE Vice-President Mahir Mammedov (delegate for Azerbaijan), FIDE Vice-President Akaki Iashvili (delegate for Georgia). I am confident that I will be as efficient as they are to bring exciting new opportunities for Canadian players, coaches and organizers once the CFC Voting Members trust me with the position of a delegate from Canada.




2- Do you receive any compensation for your management position in FIDE?

Since the President Arkady Dvorkovich’s 2018 electoral triumph, FIDE started its transformation into a transparent, open, democratic, streamlined institution that is modeled after the best Western corporations. We have a dedicated executive team. The executive compensation numbers are published in the FIDE budget (such as the 2021 budget, presented at the Dec 2020 General Assembly). As was reported to the FIDE Council at the time, the salaries for FIDE managers were cut across the board since the COVID-19 pandemic started in 2020, and remain at those reduced levels. Among other FIDE executives, I do receive compensation for my work.



3- Are you currently a governor or a management member of any CFC rival association or organization?

I am not aware of the existence of any “CFC rival associations or organizations”.


If "yes" to either Question 2 or Question 3, then you must not be a CFC voting member either because it is also a conflict of interest.
As I’ve already explained above, there is *no* conflict of interest, either from the FIDE side or from the CFC side. Both federations are partners working for the same objectives. I am puzzled by your statement that FIDE and the CFC are opponents; I suggest strongly that you study the Charter and other relevant FIDE documents.

Suffice it to say that the Chairman of the elected FIDE Constitutional Commission (CON), which reviews and oversees compliance with “FIDE Charter, Bylaws, Electoral Rules, Ethics and Disciplinary Code, Financial Rules”, is distinguished jurist and academic Roberto Rivello. Maitre Rivello is a delegate for Italy and he does a wonderful job promoting his country’s interests.

FIDE has the Code of Ethics; the Ethics and Disciplinary Commission is chaired by a renowned lawyer François Strydom (South Africa). The CFC has its Continuance papers properly filed with Corporations Canada.

I am in full compliance with both. Electing me to the CFC FIDE Representative position will be in full compliance with both. As already stated, I will look after Canada’s interests and will promote Canada’s agenda.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

For the benefit of our colleagues who are just coming to this entertaining discussion, I will reproduce in full my February 09 post (http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/showthread.php?5582-CFC-FIDE-Representative-election-Feb-2021&p=36180#post36180).

Vadim, what I see in your examples are "delegates". It is quite different from the Zonal President and 16.12 does not apply to them.


16.4 FIDE officials] are all persons who bear a FIDE office and/or who represents FIDE in occasion of events or competitions, even if temporary. Among others, the President, the Deputy President, the Treasurer, the Secretary of the Council, the Vice Presidents, the Continental Presidents, the Zonal Presidents, the Chairmen of Commissions, the Directorsand also the principals of FIDE Olympiads and World Championships are FIDE officials.

16.12 FIDE officials may not simultaneously hold another position within the organisation that creates a conflict of interest.

[Sasha Starr]

16.12 FIDE officials may not simultaneously hold another position within the organisation that creates a conflict of interest.
So it is obviously up to FIDE, not to you, to satisfy itself whether it's official could hold another position that indeed creates a conflict of interest.
Besides I'm curious what kind of conflict of interest could arise in the FIDE - CFC's relationship. Please explain. Provide an example.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

Sorry, but you need to explain your curious sentence : "what kind of conflict of interest could arise in the FIDE - CFC's relationship" What is that?
To my knowledge the conflict of interest is regarding a person; companies compete or collaborate. Thus, what have you tried to say?

[Sasha Starr]

Ok, thank you for helping me out! Supposedly someone God forbid is holding executive position in both CFC and FIDE. And what kind of hypothetical situation could have arisen so that person could be found himself/herself in the conflict of interest? Please describe it if you can. Your input is greatly appreciated!

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

Supposedly someone God forbid is holding executive position in both CFC and FIDE. And what kind of hypothetical situation could have arisen so that person could be found himself/herself in the conflict of interest


Your hypothetical situation is in the Non-For-Profit Corporations Act:

"Disclosure of interest

141 (1) A director or an officer of a corporation shall disclose to the corporation, in writing or by requesting to have it entered in the minutes of meetings of directors or of committees of directors, the nature and extent of any interest that the director or officer has in a material contract or material transaction, whether made or proposed, with the corporation, if the director or officer

(a) is a party to the contract or transaction;
(b) is a director or an officer, or an individual acting in a similar capacity, of a party to the contract or transaction; or
(c) has a material interest in a party to the contract or transaction."

[Sasha Starr]

No, I haven't asked you for lecturing me on the rules. I've asked you to describe the actual situation where a person holding executive positions both in CFC and FIDE could find him/her self in a conflict of interest. I can't think of any. And what about you?

[Francis Rodrigues]

Your hypothetical situation is in the Non-For-Profit Corporations Act:

"Disclosure of interest

141 (1) A director or an officer of a corporation shall disclose to the corporation, in writing or by requesting to have it entered in the minutes of meetings of directors or of committees of directors, the nature and extent of any interest that the director or officer has in a material contract or material transaction, whether made or proposed, with the corporation, if the director or officer

(a) is a party to the contract or transaction;
(b) is a director or an officer, or an individual acting in a similar capacity, of a party to the contract or transaction; or
(c) has a material interest in a party to the contract or transaction."

Egis, with all due respect, many Fide officials wear
numerous hats - it's the nature of talent to oversee
various branches of administration - and is common
to all sports organizations.

The NFP strictures relate to local bodies, not Fide.

You are a smart man, and I'm sure you know better:)
...............
If we follow this canard - all 3 candidates should be
disqualified on grounds of 'conflict of interest'!

1. The Fide rep is responsible for selecting Arbiters
to do lucrative international duty - this selection
being coordinated with the Fide Arbiters Commission.

One of the candidates for Fide rep has posted his own
membership of the Fide Arbiters Commision!! What's to
stop him selecting himself, a direct conflict of interest!

2. The Fide rep coordinates with the Fide Board to
certify international master and grandmaster norms,
sometimes in circumstances that require personal
intervention from the Fide rep to push the title through.

Another candidate here has a child on the path to
achieving the grandmaster title. Shouldn't he recuse
himself on the grounds of 'conflict of interest?'

I have no skin in this game! Just want to see a level
playing field, and the most suitable candidate elected!

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

No, I haven't asked you for lecturing me on the rules. I've asked you to describe the actual situation where a person holding executive positions both in CFC and FIDE could find him/her self in a conflict of interest. I can't think of any. And what about you?


I can, and that it is described in those rules - "a material contract" - sell & buy, your hypothetical situation unfolds.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

465

One of the situations that was most striking to me was the situation where an organizer of the 2019 World Cadets Chess Championships (WCCC) in China asked the CFC to sign an undertaking that:
I guarantee that XXX, the accompanying person of XXX will abide all the laws and regulations of the country where he stays.
Never involve politics, religion or any illegal activities unrelated to the event.
All the cost during the trip will be supported by himself. We are sure that he will leave China on time.
We are responsible for him during his stay in China.

This seemed a bit much, so much so that we discussed aborting the trip for the whole Canada delegation, dozens of youth players and parents.

We mentioned this to Vadim, not in any hope that he might do something about it but rather asking what he thought of the request and whether this was something that we might expect at future tournaments.

At best we expected that he might commiserate about the fact that we would have to decline to sign such a document and might have to decline to attend. Vadim sprung into action and asked us for documentation of what was asked and copies of the undertaking. In a few posts the situation unfolded as follows:


On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 21:36, Vadim I. Tsypin wrote:
Hello Vlad,

Congratulations! A very diplomatic letter that nevertheless doesn't give away Western values.

I am wondering about their original request with the offending sentence about a "guarantee" though. Do you have the latest version they demanded you sign? Can you please send it to me right now (5:30 a.m. in Baku)? I'd like to study the text and possibly raise an issue at the today's MB. Can't imagine the U.S. or other Western countries signing it either.

Thanks,

--
V.T.


On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:26 AM Vladimir Drkulec wrote:
The first version was a total non-starter for me as it violates my beliefs. I also have a problem with the concept that we are responsible for the individuals in the Canadian delegation. It may be due to a translation glitch but to sign that would seem to me to put both the CFC and all the members of the board at extreme risk if something went wrong. It's a huge blank cheque. I am not saying that they would behave like North Korea but we are reminded of what happened to Otto Warmbier and the submission of a multimillion-dollar medical bill. China has already grabbed two Canadians over the Huawei kerfluffle involving the U.S. and the extradition request. In six years I have not been asked to sign such an undertaking anywhere else.
Vlad


On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:51 AM Vadim I. Tsypin wrote:
Thanks Vlad and Christina,
Received and uploaded everything. I will post updates in this thread.
--
V.T.


On Jun 19, 2019, at 10:44 AM, Vadim I. Tsypin wrote:
Hello Vlad, Hal and Christina:
I included the issue of the "guarantee" demand as Item V1-03 in the today's MB Agenda and it was discussed, with exhibits you submitted thoroughly examined by everyone including the President. Several members, including both Victor Bologan and Emil Sutovsky, joined me in condemning this practice of the WCCC organizers in strongest terms. It was decided that FIDE would send a polite but very firm letter to the Chinese organizers. The FIDE Legal Advisor is charged with drafting it within a week's time. Will keep you posted,
--
V.T.


Hal Bond Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 6:56 PM
To: "Vadim I. Tsypin"
Cc: Vladimir Drkulec , Hal Bond , Christina Tao
Thanks Vadim!
Sent from my iPhone


The organizers received a terse communication from Victor Bologan the Executive Director of FIDE which reminded them of the rules that FIDE expected them to abide by. There were no more problems after. Canadian children and parents went to the WCCC and competed well.

We were left to marvel at the speed and efficiency of the whole process as Vadim flew off in his red and blue costume and cape making the world safe for Canadian junior players and their parents, not to mention CFC officials.

[Victor Itkin]

It has been a long time since we at the CFC have seen such high pre-election activity. As it was already noted, all three candidates have done a number of good things for Canadian chess, and all have significant experience in chess life.
I would like to share my thoughts on the candidacy of Vadim Tsypin. I’ve been in touch with him personally, as far as I can remember, only once - at 2018 Canadian Open in Quebec City, where he was one of the organizers. I have very good memories of this tournament, and personally of Vadim as a knowledgeable professional and as a pleasant person. I think that from qualifications standpoint Vadim is a good candidate.
However, I am concerned by one caveat: Vadim is part of FIDE Management Board (which includes 11 members only) and receives certain financial compensation for this work. Unlike Mahmud Hassain, I am not certain if this fact is a personal conflict of interest. Yet I look at this situation from a different angle.
I am worried that FIDE executive team could pressure Vadim, as CFC representative, to make certain decisions (or even vote) in their favour – in a way that may be detrimental to Canadian chess – by exploiting the fact that Vadim is essentially their paid employee.
It’s no secret that GAZPROM – majority state-owned Russian global energy monopoly – recently became the General Partner of FIDE (this is stated on FIDE website), and that the current FIDE President Arkady Dvorkovich – former Deputy Prime Minister of Russia – is a person from the inner circle of Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin (this in itself in no way diminishes Dvorkovich’s merits as FIDE President; he has managed to make several positive changes in FIDE since his election). Nevertheless, from my many years of experience in the USSR, structures with such leaders and general partners typically resolve many issues according to the principle “you for me and I for you”.
When voting in FIDE, the vote of a national federation in many cases is determined solely by its representative (in some important situations there may be a joint decision of CFC Executives). By placing Vadim Tsypin in two chairs at the same time, CFC will put itself in a vulnerable position. In such a scenario, won’t the CFC vote (voice) lose its independence?
In couple of his posts in this thread, Vadim, as an argument in his favour, noted that currently 3 FIDE Management Board members are simultaneously official representatives in FIDE of their respectful countries. These are representatives of Moldova, Qatar, and Kazakhstan. Not the most democratic countries in the world, let’s face it. I have little doubt that in exchange for the good for their national chess federations, these representatives “correctly” vote on all slippery issues. I’m not confident I’d want Canada to become the fourth country on this dubious list.
Thus, in my opinion, Vadim’s position on the FIDE Management Board serves as a detriment to his candidacy rather than strength. From this point of view, Victor Plotkin, as a candidate for this position, has an obvious advantage over other two candidates: he is financially independent from chess. Victor has never lived on chess earnings (on the contrary, from time to time he finances some chess projects with his own funds). As such, Victor will be able to represent CFC in FIDE without fear of financial repercussions. There is no doubt about that.
At the same time, Vadim Tsypin can successfully continue supporting Canadian chess just as he has done until now, holding a very honorable (paid) position at FIDE. In such an outcome, Canada will only benefit, as essentially it will have two representatives in FIDE instead of one.

[Mahmud Hassain]

It has been a long time since we at the CFC have seen such high pre-election activity. As it was already noted, all three candidates have done a number of good things for Canadian chess, and all have significant experience in chess life.
I would like to share my thoughts on the candidacy of Vadim Tsypin. I’ve been in touch with him personally, as far as I can remember, only once - at 2018 Canadian Open in Quebec City, where he was one of the organizers. I have very good memories of this tournament, and personally of Vadim as a knowledgeable professional and as a pleasant person. I think that from qualifications standpoint Vadim is a good candidate.
However, I am concerned by one caveat: Vadim is part of FIDE Management Board (which includes 11 members only) and receives certain financial compensation for this work. Unlike Mahmud Hassain, I am not certain if this fact is a personal conflict of interest. Yet I look at this situation from a different angle.
I am worried that FIDE executive team could pressure Vadim, as CFC representative, to make certain decisions (or even vote) in their favour – in a way that may be detrimental to Canadian chess – by exploiting the fact that Vadim is essentially their paid employee.
It’s no secret that GAZPROM – majority state-owned Russian global energy monopoly – recently became the General Partner of FIDE (this is stated on FIDE website), and that the current FIDE President Arkady Dvorkovich – former Deputy Prime Minister of Russia – is a person from the inner circle of Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin (this in itself in no way diminishes Dvorkovich’s merits as FIDE President; he has managed to make several positive changes in FIDE since his election). Nevertheless, from my many years of experience in the USSR, structures with such leaders and general partners typically resolve many issues according to the principle “you for me and I for you”.
When voting in FIDE, the vote of a national federation in many cases is determined solely by its representative (in some important situations there may be a joint decision of CFC Executives). By placing Vadim Tsypin in two chairs at the same time, CFC will put itself in a vulnerable position. In such a scenario, won’t the CFC vote (voice) lose its independence?
In couple of his posts in this thread, Vadim, as an argument in his favour, noted that currently 3 FIDE Management Board members are simultaneously official representatives in FIDE of their respectful countries. These are representatives of Moldova, Qatar, and Kazakhstan. Not the most democratic countries in the world, let’s face it. I have little doubt that in exchange for the good for their national chess federations, these representatives “correctly” vote on all slippery issues. I’m not confident I’d want Canada to become the fourth country on this dubious list.
Thus, in my opinion, Vadim’s position on the FIDE Management Board serves as a detriment to his candidacy rather than strength. From this point of view, Victor Plotkin, as a candidate for this position, has an obvious advantage over other two candidates: he is financially independent from chess. Victor has never lived on chess earnings (on the contrary, from time to time he finances some chess projects with his own funds). As such, Victor will be able to represent CFC in FIDE without fear of financial repercussions. There is no doubt about that.
At the same time, Vadim Tsypin can successfully continue supporting Canadian chess just as he has done until now, holding a very honorable (paid) position at FIDE. In such an outcome, Canada will only benefit, as essentially it will have two representatives in FIDE instead of one.

Thank you Victor.
I have no issue with Vadim being a CFC rep if he were not on FIDE "core management team". I find it a major red flag for me.

[Lloyd Lombard]

The issue of "Conflict of Interest" is an important one for people who may want to be involved in the future with chess at different levels, especially internationally. I have not dealt with business conflict of interest issues for "many" years and I have not done a comprehensive review of the FIDE and CFC legislation, policies and/or guidelines on the issue so I'm certain there are others who are better equipped than I to provide a more profound opinion on whether holding a position at FIDE prevents you from representing the CFC in this capacity. Having said that, conflicts of interest in business, where you stand to obtain a personal benefit from a particular transaction, generally requires you to abstain from the discussions on the subject matter and from voting on the issue. In my view, sports related matters may not fall into the same category unless, again, the person making the decision and responsible for the vote, will obtain a personal benefit. Having dual citizenships does not, in my view, in and of itself, qualify as a conflict of interest. It seems to me that we now live in a highly transient society where people move from one country to another on a regular basis, often obtaining dual citizenship. I'm assuming that all three candidates are Canadian citizens and have been so for a number of years. It may be that the CFC should look at its Representative qualifications and have a requirement of "x" number of years Canadian citizenship before becoming a Representative on an international chess organization (or maybe we already do ?).

Mr. Itkin, you bring up an important issue where even "possible" conflict of interests are generally seen as a reason for persons to abstain from discussion and decision making. However, it seems to me that if FIDE is being threatened by a sponsor to, for example, "refrain from sponsorship unless "x" is done ...", this is not, or should not be, a conflict of interest issue (at least at first glance). Any and all FIDE representatives will have to view the sponsorship issue, whether they're a member of the FIDE organization or a Representative Delegate and make their decision based upon the facts presented to them. Again, each situation must be assessed on its own facts however the situation outlined does not necessarily raise an issue of conflict, at least in my opinion.

[Sasha Starr]

it has been a long time since we at the cfc have seen such high pre-election activity. As it was already noted, all three candidates have done a number of good things for canadian chess, and all have significant experience in chess life.
I would like to share my thoughts on the candidacy of vadim tsypin. I’ve been in touch with him personally, as far as i can remember, only once - at 2018 canadian open in quebec city, where he was one of the organizers. I have very good memories of this tournament, and personally of vadim as a knowledgeable professional and as a pleasant person. I think that from qualifications standpoint vadim is a good candidate.
However, i am concerned by one caveat: Vadim is part of fide management board (which includes 11 members only) and receives certain financial compensation for this work. Unlike mahmud hassain, i am not certain if this fact is a personal conflict of interest. Yet i look at this situation from a different angle.
I am worried that fide executive team could pressure vadim, as cfc representative, to make certain decisions (or even vote) in their favour – in a way that may be detrimental to canadian chess – by exploiting the fact that vadim is essentially their paid employee.
It’s no secret that gazprom – majority state-owned russian global energy monopoly – recently became the general partner of fide (this is stated on fide website), and that the current fide president arkady dvorkovich – former deputy prime minister of russia – is a person from the inner circle of dmitry medvedev and vladimir putin (this in itself in no way diminishes dvorkovich’s merits as fide president; he has managed to make several positive changes in fide since his election). Nevertheless, from my many years of experience in the ussr, structures with such leaders and general partners typically resolve many issues according to the principle “you for me and i for you”.
When voting in fide, the vote of a national federation in many cases is determined solely by its representative (in some important situations there may be a joint decision of cfc executives). By placing vadim tsypin in two chairs at the same time, cfc will put itself in a vulnerable position. In such a scenario, won’t the cfc vote (voice) lose its independence?
In couple of his posts in this thread, vadim, as an argument in his favour, noted that currently 3 fide management board members are simultaneously official representatives in fide of their respectful countries. These are representatives of moldova, qatar, and kazakhstan. Not the most democratic countries in the world, let’s face it. I have little doubt that in exchange for the good for their national chess federations, these representatives “correctly” vote on all slippery issues. I’m not confident i’d want canada to become the fourth country on this dubious list.
Thus, in my opinion, vadim’s position on the fide management board serves as a detriment to his candidacy rather than strength. From this point of view, victor plotkin, as a candidate for this position, has an obvious advantage over other two candidates: He is financially independent from chess. Victor has never lived on chess earnings (on the contrary, from time to time he finances some chess projects with his own funds). As such, victor will be able to represent cfc in fide without fear of financial repercussions. There is no doubt about that.
At the same time, vadim tsypin can successfully continue supporting canadian chess just as he has done until now, holding a very honorable (paid) position at fide. In such an outcome, canada will only benefit, as essentially it will have two representatives in fide instead of one.

Das Kapital

[Sasha Starr]

You are making a case why Victor is a better candidate then Vadim. And what about Aris???

[Victor Itkin]

You are making a case why Victor is a better candidate then Vadim. And what about Aris???

Aris is also a good candidate.

The answer to your question you can find in my original post:

From this point of view, Victor Plotkin, as a candidate for this position, has an obvious advantage over other two candidates

[Sasha Starr]

Aris is also a good candidate.

The answer to your question you can find in my original post:

From this point of view, Victor Plotkin, as a candidate for this position, has an obvious advantage over other two candidates

In my opinion Victor's set of skills includes primarily playing and coaching skills. However I'd doubted his diplomacy talents, perhaps, and in any case to get to the level where Vadim already is will take Victor 2 to 5 years - if he is successful...

However Vadim has everything in one package today, ALREADY! So is CFC better off to have someone who'll hopefully deliver something in the next few years at the best, or somebody who has ALL required connections and experience to do it all not even in the next day or two, but actually TODAY?

[Jeremy Clark]

In my opinion Victor's set of skills includes primarily playing and coaching skills. However I'd doubted his diplomacy talents, perhaps, and in any case to get to the level where Vadim already is will take Victor 2 to 5 years - if he is successful...

However Vadim has everything in one package today, ALREADY! So is CFC better off to have someone who'll hopefully deliver something in the next few years at the best, or somebody who has ALL required connections and experience to do it all not even in the next day or two, but actually TODAY?

A bit presumptuous to declare that Victor could deliver something in the next few years at best. You haven't the faintest idea what the future holds. Speculating is one thing, but you declared that as a foregone conclusion.

[Vadim Tsypin]

In my view, sports related matters may not fall into the same category unless, again, the person making the decision and responsible for the vote, will obtain a personal benefit. Having dual citizenships does not, in my view, in and of itself, qualify as a conflict of interest. It seems to me that we now live in a highly transient society where people move from one country to another on a regular basis, often obtaining dual citizenship. I'm assuming that all three candidates are Canadian citizens and have been so for a number of years. It may be that the CFC should look at its Representative qualifications and have a requirement of "x" number of years Canadian citizenship before becoming a Representative on an international chess organization (or maybe we already do ?).

Dear Lloyd, thank you for emphasizing this important angle.

FIDE's policies are completely aligned with what you wrote. As a result of an initiative spearheaded by FIDE Vice-President GM Nigel Short, the new FIDE Charter includes the following provision.


17.6 Presidents and delegates may only represent one Member Federation at a time and must, on the date of the meeting of the General Assembly, have either:
- a citizenship or at least two years’ residency of the country or territory they represent, or
- at least one year experience as an office holder of this Member Federation.

Pleased to make a voluntary disclosure now:

I, Vadim Tsypin, have been granted the Canadian permanent resident status in 1992 and immigrated to Canada as per the Federal Skilled Worker program.
I, Vadim Tsypin, have the honour of being Canadian citizen since 1996.
I hold no other citizenship and always travel the world, for business or pleasure, on a Canadian passport.

[Sasha Starr]

A bit presumptuous to declare that Victor could deliver something in the next few years at best. You haven't the faintest idea what the future holds. Speculating is one thing, but you declared that as a foregone conclusion.

No, I'm not declaring anything. Agree, no one has the "faintest idea what the future holds". One more time - I'm not declaring anything. Never mind foregone conclusion.
Instead of attacking my post say something of a substance if you can, please.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

Egis, with all due respect, many Fide officials wear
numerous hats - it's the nature of talent to oversee
various branches of administration - and is common
to all sports organizations.

The NFP strictures relate to local bodies, not Fide.

You are a smart man, and I'm sure you know better:)
...............
If we follow this canard - all 3 candidates should be
disqualified on grounds of 'conflict of interest'!

1. The Fide rep is responsible for selecting Arbiters
to do lucrative international duty - this selection
being coordinated with the Fide Arbiters Commission.

One of the candidates for Fide rep has posted his own
membership of the Fide Arbiters Commision!! What's to
stop him selecting himself, a direct conflict of interest!

2. The Fide rep coordinates with the Fide Board to
certify international master and grandmaster norms,
sometimes in circumstances that require personal
intervention from the Fide rep to push the title through.

Another candidate here has a child on the path to
achieving the grandmaster title. Shouldn't he recuse
himself on the grounds of 'conflict of interest?'

I have no skin in this game! Just want to see a level
playing field, and the most suitable candidate elected!

Thank you for the kind words. The next time we'll meet and hopefully soon, we shall discuss more about current FIDE than my son or old interviews. It might be a more productive talk :)

As you pulled in arbiters and family members, you needed to add (3) to combine them together, didnt'?

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

I have not dealt with business conflict of interest issues for "many" years and I have not done a comprehensive review of the FIDE and CFC legislation, policies and/or guidelines on the issue

At this moment, the CFC has not a (special) policy/guidelines/procedure regarding conflict of interests. (special) -- anything beyond the NFP Act.

The "older" handbook had a clause about "chess business" persons not eligible to be executives. Is it still valid? The question was raised amongst Execs. (need to follow up)

[Vladimir Drkulec]

At this moment, the CFC has not a (special) policy/guidelines/procedure regarding conflict of interests. (special) -- anything beyond the NFP Act.

The "older" handbook had a clause about "chess business" persons not eligible to be executives. Is it still valid? The question was raised amongst Execs. (need to follow up)


The clause is superseded by the NFP act. It looks to me that you are putting forward arguments using the old handbook when it suits your aim and ignoring it when it doesn't. The handbook is our policy except where it directly contradicts the act. In this case it does contradict the act. This clause is there to keep Larry Bevand from becoming CFC president. I'm not going to comment on the utility of passing a law to keep one person out of a particular position when that person has been wildly successful in similar positions.

If Larry Bevand were to run for CFC president, I might campaign for him.

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

The handbook is our policy except where it directly contradicts the act. In this case it does contradict the act.

How?

You're are welcome to point when I'm ignoring as well.

[Vadim Tsypin]

Honourable Voting Members,
Dear colleagues:

I am grateful to the renowned Toronto-based entrepreneur and chess promoter Alexander Starr for an invitation to appear on his popular weekly IBM TV show alongside with my dear old friend, the leading world expert in cheating detection Prof. Kenneth Regan, GM and prize-winning author of chess books Mihail Marin, and the artist Maria Yugina. I am proud to become the first-ever Canadian guest there.

Among other pressing topics, we have discussed several issues regarding FIDE and its support for national federations that are directly relevant to the present election. I cordially invite those of you who didn't have a chance to catch a live broadcast to watch its recording.

A word of warning: "Intended for mature audiences only. This show contains scenes that some viewers may find disturbing. Viewer discretion is advised."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFhwjmxNhbs

[Vladimir Drkulec]

I would like to express my support for Victor Plotkin as candidate for the CFC FIDE Representative position. I have known Victor for more than 10 years, facing him numerous times over the chessboard as well as playing under his captaincy at the 2018 and 2019 FIDE World Senior Team Championships. In all my interactions with Victor, he has demonstrated the highest levels of sportsmanship and integrity. In my opinion, he is ideally qualified for the FIDE rep position, offering a strong combination of leadership skills, business acumen, and a deep knowledge of Canadian and world chess. His wide experience encompasses the roles of national team captain, chess parent, and IM-strength player, which makes him well attuned to the perspectives of key stakeholders. I warmly recommend Victor for this important role.


David Cummings, IM




David is another friendly Toronto area player who is often seen in tournaments in Toronto, Kitchener and surrounding regions. He is a regular contributor to Chesspublishing.com on the topic of flank openings like the English which he has also written books on. The excellent book published three or four years ago suggested a repertoire which offered a non-fianchetto approach to the opening for white. David was also a Canadian over 50 Seniors champion and I believe he won the continental event as well. He gave an entertaining lecture on the English in Sault Ste. Marie at the time of the Canadian Open in 2017.

[Victor Plotkin]

In my opinion Victor's set of skills includes primarily playing and coaching skills. However I'd doubted his diplomacy talents, perhaps, and in any case to get to the level where Vadim already is will take Victor 2 to 5 years - if he is successful...

However Vadim has everything in one package today, ALREADY! So is CFC better off to have someone who'll hopefully deliver something in the next few years at the best, or somebody who has ALL required connections and experience to do it all not even in the next day or two, but actually TODAY?

I believe, you greatly underestimate me. If I had thought that getting to that level would take 2 to 5 years, I wouldn't have run for this position.

[Mahmud Hassain]

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I just received this email from Michael von Keitz and he requested that I post it on his behalf. He had lost his log in contacts.

START

"I am aware that Hal Bond did not happily resign in the middle of his term, and I have been provided with a private explanation for that decision which leaves me deeply concerned for our Federation. Vlad Drkulec has served our Federation with distinction for many years (only John Prentice has had a longer tenure as President), but I am hopeful a suitable candidate will emerge to continue his legacy at the time of the next AGM.

I support Victor Plotkin's candidacy to serve as our FIDE Representative. As highlighted by Victor Itkin, having two Canadians advocating for our Federation within FIDE is an enviable outcome. I fail to see the added value in having one individual serve in two roles within FIDE, when Vadim Tsypin has already proven himself to be in a role which allows for effective advocacy on behalf of Canadian causes.

I am dissatisfied with what appears to me to be a unilateral decision to propose an eighth executive role within our Federation, ostensibly on the basis of gender equality. Among other concerns, this raises the question of why the Federation would consider taking a binary stance on the question of gender, risking potential alienation of other groups. Operating within our existing model, which itself is perhaps antiquated, I would instead encourage the proposed candidate to run for election as the Women's Coordinator during the Federation's next AGM. There is no urgency to this matter.

As a member of our Federation, I feel the Voting Members will be faced with a series of important decisions over the coming weeks and months. A new course is being charted and I do not envy the decision-makers.

Yours in Chess,

Michael von Keitz"


END

[Sasha Starr]

I believe, you greatly underestimate me. If I had thought that getting to that level would take 2 to 5 years, I wouldn't have run for this position.

Victor, perhaps it would take less time for you to become productive, perhaps more. It has nothing to do with your personality at all. If you'll see the today's chess show on IBM TV (Vadim has published the link) you'll see an accomplished chess professional operating on the highest level and it is overly difficult to imagine someone more effective then Vadim for several reasons. Too many to list... It doesn't mean that if you've been in that position you wouldn't been able to succeed. Probably you could. But in this particular situation I'm sure that you yourself, your son and many Canadians could greatly benefit from the Vadim's experience, connections, knowledge and desire to do well for all Canadians chess lovers!

[Sasha Starr]

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I just received this email from Michael von Keitz and he requested that I post it on his behalf. He had lost his log in contacts.

START

"I am aware that Hal Bond did not happily resign in the middle of his term, and I have been provided with a private explanation for that decision which leaves me deeply concerned for our Federation. Vlad Drkulec has served our Federation with distinction for many years (only John Prentice has had a longer tenure as President), but I am hopeful a suitable candidate will emerge to continue his legacy at the time of the next AGM.

I support Victor Plotkin's candidacy to serve as our FIDE Representative. As highlighted by Victor Itkin, having two Canadians advocating for our Federation within FIDE is an enviable outcome. I fail to see the added value in having one individual serve in two roles within FIDE, when Vadim Tsypin has already proven himself to be in a role which allows for effective advocacy on behalf of Canadian causes.

I am dissatisfied with what appears to me to be a unilateral decision to propose an eighth executive role within our Federation, ostensibly on the basis of gender equality. Among other concerns, this raises the question of why the Federation would consider taking a binary stance on the question of gender, risking potential alienation of other groups. Operating within our existing model, which itself is perhaps antiquated, I would instead encourage the proposed candidate to run for election as the Women's Coordinator during the Federation's next AGM. There is no urgency to this matter.

As a member of our Federation, I feel the Voting Members will be faced with a series of important decisions over the coming weeks and months. A new course is being charted and I do not envy the decision-makers.

Yours in Chess,

Michael von Keitz"


END

Michael von Keitz... What a mess! Hal Bond did not happily resign... Could be. Vlad Drkulec has served our Federation with distinction for many years. OK. And one day there will be a suitable candidate - good! And I have no problem with Michael's support for Victor Plotkin.

Now things are getting murky. Two Canadians for the price of one? Enviable outcome? I don't think so. With such a fierce competition for the CFC FIDE Representative position there will be a very little incentive for the loser to cooperate in any way with a winner. And if Vadim wins he needs practically nothing from Victor. However the opposite outcome puts Victor in not very enviable position - unless Vadim will show his largesse and will help... In that scenario Victor would completely dependant on Vadim. Would he be willing to provide Victor with a free training?

Well, Victor himself said that once elected he will heavily rely on Vadim's experience, connections, etc. So it implies that there will be more or less lengthy training period. Assuming that Vadim will provide it... But what if not, as I'm afraid?

In any case - obviously the choice is ours to make!

[Patricia Gamliel]

Mr. Mahmud Hassain

Kindly advise Mr. Michael von Keitz that I have answered his post:

If adding 1 woman to the one already there is reaching gender equality at the CFC I wonder who at the executive are women pretending to be men ... Even more puzzling when the only position you propose that can belong to a woman is Women’s coordinator. I suggest this position will be viable when the Men’s coordinator position will be created at the same time: The whole, of course in the name of gender equality right?

I wish people would read the two posts (yes only 2) I have posted. It is surprising that mature professionals would only cruise through them to end up one to compare me to his wife ( no offence to her Mr. Plotkin but seriously????) and the other as my only skill to be a women coordinator at the CFC? ��

Sorry, guys, I can do much more than raising 3 kids: I actually did that while at the same time working full time and going to university full time and volunteering as a Union collective agreements negotiator.

End of 3rd post.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I just received this email from Michael von Keitz and he requested that I post it on his behalf. He had lost his log in contacts.

START

"I am aware that Hal Bond did not happily resign in the middle of his term, and I have been provided with a private explanation for that decision which leaves me deeply concerned for our Federation. Vlad Drkulec has served our Federation with distinction for many years (only John Prentice has had a longer tenure as President), but I am hopeful a suitable candidate will emerge to continue his legacy at the time of the next AGM.

I support Victor Plotkin's candidacy to serve as our FIDE Representative. As highlighted by Victor Itkin, having two Canadians advocating for our Federation within FIDE is an enviable outcome. I fail to see the added value in having one individual serve in two roles within FIDE, when Vadim Tsypin has already proven himself to be in a role which allows for effective advocacy on behalf of Canadian causes.

I am dissatisfied with what appears to me to be a unilateral decision to propose an eighth executive role within our Federation, ostensibly on the basis of gender equality. Among other concerns, this raises the question of why the Federation would consider taking a binary stance on the question of gender, risking potential alienation of other groups. Operating within our existing model, which itself is perhaps antiquated, I would instead encourage the proposed candidate to run for election as the Women's Coordinator during the Federation's next AGM. There is no urgency to this matter.

As a member of our Federation, I feel the Voting Members will be faced with a series of important decisions over the coming weeks and months. A new course is being charted and I do not envy the decision-makers.

Yours in Chess,

Michael von Keitz"


END

Sexism masquerading as wokeism is a very bad look. I have had multiple conversations with women who have been less than enamoured with the statements that there is an appropriate job suited to women within the CFC. Patricia Gamliel is a woman who would be welcome on any other non-profit board and wouldn't have to endure such appalling conduct.

[Victor Itkin]

However, for the CFC FIDE Representative position, Vadim is the best candidate in my opinion. He is very active and professional in regard to organizing things, and I know it from my experience of working with him within FIDE.

I’m not sure about the other voting members, but personally I understood these words in such a way that some time ago Anna Burtasova used to work for FIDE, and since then she highly appreciates the professionalism of Vadim Tsypin.

I was surprised to find out that Anna Burtasova is currently working for FIDE office in Switzerland as a “FIDE Website and Social Media Manager” (one of the eight official employees https://www.fide.com/directory/fide-officials).

There is nothing wrong with her public support of Vadim, but I just wanted to emphasize (for those like me who thought Anna was discussing her past work experience) that for the CFC FIDE Representative position Anna Burtasova is endorsing her more senior current colleague at FIDE.

[Christopher Mallon]

My personal feeling is that we of course shouldn't "relegate" women to the Women's Coordinator position. At the same time, isn't it totally ridiculous to have a man in the women's coordinator position? (Yes, I realize that he is often - maybe always? - the only person running for the position.)

Also doesn't it make more sense for an executive board member to have a purpose or job?


Back on topic, however...


Michael von Keitz... What a mess! Hal Bond did not happily resign... Could be.


Sasha, I am not sure why you feel the need to attack everyone who you disagree with, but I take issue with you referring to Michael Von Keitz as "what a mess" ... he had the unenviable task of being in charge of the CFC at the worst time in our history, as he dealt with the office closing, the tail end of an ED era as well as the beginnings of the NFP changeover. When he stepped down as President after 20 months, he received thanks and positive reviews from many people, including multiple members of the current Exec. Here is a public sampling: http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/showthread.php?3248-Resignation

And it "could be" true that Hal did not happily resign? I think it's fairly obvious that he's not happy! You are a VM and so you should have already read his resignation letter. Here it is, in case you missed it: http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/showthread.php?5570-Hal-Bond-Resignation-email-as-CFC-FIDE-representative

[Lloyd Lombard]

Hi Patricia, I have read all the posts in this forum and don't see your other two posts which I would like to read. Can you please either repost them or point to where they can be found ?

[Patricia Gamliel]

Good morning,

There is another short thread to add me at the executive. I can’t find my first thread where I was presenting myself in an informal fashion (the one that triggered Mr. Plotkin’s reply comparing me to his wife after he read that I have three children - remember that he wants to represent the CFC at FIDE). I can't find it right now. But I am fairly present on internet. As for the 2nd post, here it is:

Quote Originally Posted by Patricia Gamliel:

Good evening,
This is my first post and might not be my last. However, please accept that when I do post it might not be to answer posts of others.*
This being said, I believe that as a non-profit org. the CFC is entitled to take advantage of existing government programs including but not limited to loans partially forgivable, the hiring of youth within Canada Summer Jobs programs paid by the government, etc...
Moreover, CFC's revenues can be increased with various groups membership such as, for example, corporate membership and educational institution membership.*Memberships may also allow for tax-deductible donations to the CFC by making Canadian chess activities eligible for such consideration.
This can be accomplished through various paths along which general outreach initiatives to Canadian and multinational corporations. Sponsoring chess shall become a win-win proposition.*As well, the CFC visibility may be increased through the FIDE Social Commission as Chess is a universal language and a tool to help low-income families, newcomers to Canada, refugees, and prison inmates. Grants from corresponding government departments may be available.
Finally, and some of you may have seen it coming, I will help the CFC to achieve gender equality. I will strongly support Canadian girls and women both in chess competitions and in chess governance.

Thank you for inviting me to apply.

Sincerely,

[Patricia Gamliel]

Mr. Mallone.

On part of your post only:

The goal is not to bring me in the CFC because I am a woman but because of what I can do.
My gender really came into play because some people could not see me beyond my gender and THAT is very sad for an organization such as the CFC and I hope this will change.

[Victor Itkin]

And it "could be" true that Hal did not happily resign? I think it's fairly obvious that he's not happy! You are a VM and so you should have already read his resignation letter. Here it is, in case you missed it: http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/showthread.php?5570-Hal-Bond-Resignation-email-as-CFC-FIDE-representative

I don't know about Sasha, but I myself have definitively missed an important point from Hal Bond's resignation letter:

" ...The Arbiter Upgrade application submitted by Diana Tsypina is materially flawed – it attempts to exploit the wording of the regulations while disregarding basic principles of the FIDE Arbiter system..."

In order to understand this issue better, it would be nice to hear from Vadim his point of view and comments about this matter.

[Jeremy Clark]

I don't know about Sasha, but I myself have definitively missed an important point from Hal Bond's resignation letter:

" ...The Arbiter Upgrade application submitted by Diana Tsypina is materially flawed – it attempts to exploit the wording of the regulations while disregarding basic principles of the FIDE Arbiter system..."

In order to understand this issue better, it would be nice to hear from Vadim his point of view and comments about this matter.

I asked about this when it was first posted and received no response from anyone. I, too, would like to hear Vadim's response to this, preferably in advance of the voting.

[Victor Plotkin]

Taken from Patricia Gamliel's post: "It is surprising that mature professionals would only cruise through them to end up one to compare me to his wife ( no offence to her Mr. Plotkin but seriously????) and the other as my only skill to be a women coordinator at the CFC? ��

Sorry, guys, I can do much more than raising 3 kids: I actually did that while at the same time working full time and going to university full time and volunteering as a Union collective agreements negotiator."

I had no intention of comparing you to my wife. My wife is truly incomparable.

I liked your "seriously????" My wife is a professor at the UofT (faculty of medicine), President of the Ontario Association of Pathologists, Director of Continuous Professional Development at the UofT, Chair of the Group at the Major International Oncology Organization, and a physician-scientist at the tertiary cancer center. She also volunteers at several professional and non-profit organizations.

My apologies for the off-topic post. I would never have done it otherwise. Let's be courteous.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

I don't know about Sasha, but I myself have definitively missed an important point from Hal Bond's resignation letter:

" ...The Arbiter Upgrade application submitted by Diana Tsypina is materially flawed – it attempts to exploit the wording of the regulations while disregarding basic principles of the FIDE Arbiter system..."

In order to understand this issue better, it would be nice to hear from Vadim his point of view and comments about this matter.




I asked about this when it was first posted and received no response from anyone. I, too, would like to hear Vadim's response to this, preferably in advance of the voting.

You received a response from me on the voting members forum


While discussing the replacement options, I'd be interested in learning if there will be any investigation in the matters Hal raised in his resignation letter, specifically the FIDE arbiter process which he claims suffered from interference by the executive.

Edit: I should add that I joined as a VM from Ontario at Hal's request, and am aware of the larger backstory that has led to this point.

There was no interference from the executive. Hal Bond's decision was appealed to the board of directors. It is not interference when it is your job to decide on the case.

The board of directors is the ultimate appeal court within the CFC unless or until you go to FIDE or an actual court of law.

There was a way for the case to go forward without the CFC's approval by applying directly to FIDE. A successful application after we refused would make us look very bad. We would appear to be working to block the advance of a francophone woman. Not a good look for us. I am not afraid of a fight on social media but I would not touch this kind of stinky meat case with a ten foot pole and try to defend it. And my duty would be to publicly defend it.

I am not afraid to look bad to whoever has to thwart certain people because they are afraid to sign their name and hope the CFC will do their dirty work for them. Dealing a jack from the back of the pack, they said you lose again (am I going to be the only one who knows that reference?). Cue line from "The Usual Suspects". If this application fails I take the hit and the new FIDE rep gets to say it was that darn president, what can I do?

The FQE also asked us to look at this and make the right judgment based on the rules as written and not as some individual on the arbiters commission might have wished the rule was written.

Make no mistake, this would have ended up in a court of law where the letter of the FIDE rule, with every modifying comma significant in whether we were engaged in discrimination.

In all such cases we need to refrain from a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict. A successful application means more competition for the person making the decision and the members of the arbiters commission working towards dismissal of this application at the CFC level. Add in the clear animosity angle and this is not a hill that I would be willing to die on and for. If it is a bad application reject it and blame that idiot Vlad Drkulec and the board members who can read English and see that the application well may succeed and who don't see success as some kind of threat. Think of every arbiter as an element of our infrastructure. We need more of them. We need more women arbiters so young girls can see that this is a reasonable activity for them to engage in.

There are many aspects of this case which are troubling from the point of view of the executive. The application was clearly marked pending time served or some such at the very top. We were provided with the FIDE statute which may be poorly written but we read the rule as written and it seemed that we should not be acting as a gatekeeper to prevent a Canadian from advancing, particularly a Canadian woman when I had just attended a seminar by the Canadian Olympic Committee on the best practices for non-profit NSO's required if we wanted to stay in the good graces of the IOC and the COC. A court case would hang on the rules as written which everyone admits (even the people on the arbiters commission) are badly written. The IOC and by delegation the COC had mandated that we integrate more women into the ranks of referees, umpires, line judges for the other sports and arbiters for chess.

I submit that the two IAs, two or three NAs, on the board came to the conclusion that their conscience guided them towards.

If some guy on the arbiters commission doesn't like it, blame it on Canada.

It is very rarely that I can work in references to Al Stewart, The Usual Suspects, and South Park into one post.

[Vadim Tsypin]

Mr. Mallone.

On part of your post only:

The goal is not to bring me in the CFC because I am a woman but because of what I can do.
My gender really came into play because some people could not see me beyond my gender and THAT is very sad for an organization such as the CFC and I hope this will change.

Patricia,

As a ranking member of the FIDE Social Commission (SOC) appointed by the FIDE President in 2018, you are well recognized worldwide for your accomplishments and your capabilities - not for your gender. Please rest assured that the Canadian chess community is open-minded, progressive and dynamic. All of us, including the honourable Voting Members, hold close to our heart the values enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. There is no gender discrimination in the CFC.

As the Secretary of the FIDE Management Board - the body whose mandate includes coordination of activities of Non-Elected Commissions - I am privileged to deal on a regular basis both with SOC Chairman Paris Klerides (Cyprus) and with SOC Secretary Philippe Victor Chatelain (Haiti). In all professional discussions with these gentlemen over the years, none of them ever mentioned to me your gender - only your analytical and problem-solving skills that were crucial to so many FIDE SOC projects, such as the disaster relief in the Caribbean and refugee support in Bangladesh.




The FIDE Social Commission ‘‘SOC’’ is dedicated to using chess as a tool for social development. SOC advocates for the use of chess as a tool for social change through action as:

An equalizer for gender, social and economic development.
For life skills, ethics, good character development and empowerment.
A tool to reach out to children-at-risk including those in impoverished communities, refugee camps and those in prisons.
To work with organizations that aim to combat problems connected to memory loss and aging.



Additionally, SOC will support programs that have a positive impact on many lives. Using chess as a platform to empower teachers in communities, as well as providing support that will help children to develop life skills and promote positive social development. The key is to prepare programs, training and opportunities that empower the people that are using chess as a tool for social development within their bases, whether they are teachers, instructors, and/or social workers.

Providing access to FIDE seminars is a key component to empowering chess promoters and players so they acquire expertise to build chess in their countries. SOC seeks to strengthen the social fabric of communities for encounter through chess that can strengthen the dialogue between generations.
Chess is an amazing game and tool with the power to transform lives!!!

Our vision: Enabling the less privileged in society to realise their full potential in life.
Our Mission: To inspire and transform lives by empowering others.
Our Values: Compassion, Selfless service, Integrity, Accountability and Equal opportunities for all.

SOC cooperates with FIDE member federations in order to achieve its goals.



https://www.cowlinglegal.com/blog/women-leading-in-law-patricia-gamliel

[Egidijus Zeromskis]

As a ranking member of the FIDE Social Commission (SOC) appointed by the FIDE President in 2018


May I ask: was it by your recommendation? You were the adviser of the FIDE President at that moment, were not you?

I have just started my tenure as a vice-president of the CFC back in 2018, and inquired how persons get on FIDE commissions without passing the national federation as there were other appointments what lifted my eyebrows.

[Vladimir Drkulec]

A further point you are raising matters that deal with privacy in a public forum. Claiming that an application is deficient can be construed as defamatory.

Francis pointed out Canada's dismal record in providing opportunities for arbiters on the international stage aside from one or two.

Hal Bond probably should have recused himself from involvement in this file due to his public feud with the applicants husband.

Hal Bond probably should have recused himself from involvement in this file due to the fact that he had a financial interest in not allowing this application to proceed.

It is not even the FIDE rep's job to make a decision on whether a norm application or a title upgrade is to proceed or not. It is his or her job to help Canadians to push forward.


The Executive voted to allow this application to proceed. That prompted Hal's resignation.

[Sasha Starr]

I've been accused already by a few VMs of attacking fellows VMs etc. for disagreeing with me. I've never had any such intentions.
In fact all this affair is hardly passing a smell test. Hal's resignation letter, an attempt to make Aris his heir, a race between Aris and Vadim, then Victor is getting there and Aris resigning...

However let me reiterate where I stand without attacking anybody:

Vadim's background in chess governance, including being a core member of the new FIDE management team since the 2018 FIDE elections, makes him the best candidate for this position. Only Vadim will be able to open the door wide for Canada into world chess and to bring exciting opportunities for Canadian players, coaches, and organizers. His campaign already has widespread support in all provinces and has been endorsed by well-respected chess professionals on the CFC site and in social media.

Victor Plotkin is in the right spot as the Men's team Captain, his skills set is good for that. Were he to be elected Canada delegate, he would become one of 195 mostly nameless delegates who stand in line with empty hands for four years in a row and are never given anything for their countries apart from an offer or two during the FIDE election year. Realistically, with Victor the delegate Canada will always be behind Kosovo, Burkina Faso or Venezuela in access to any FIDE help. Victor is on record in his electoral program stating that if he were elected, he would rely on Vadim Tsypin and would seek his help dealing with FIDE. Doesn't this tell you everything? Why have a second-hand article when you can own a genuine item?!

Vadim is already at the FIDE's highest table where all important issues - budgets, event bids, regulations - are decided upon. Shall not Canada literally leap at this chance and embrace Vadim as its most capable advocate (see: China WCCC letter, disabled player transfer, Para Olympiad, wild card in World Youth Online, all-expense-paid trip for young players to the Vladimir Dvorkovich Cup, etc.) ?!

I understand the tribalism in political process, and chess is no exception. And if there were two approximately equally qualified candidates either choice is OK. But today's situation is not the case...
Our choice without tribalism issues is an easy one!

Sasha Starr, VM

[Vladimir Drkulec]

http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/showthread.php?5606-CFC-FIDE-Representative-election-Feb-2021-Part-II

Non voting members can continue the discussion above.

Voting members can continue the discussion at the meeting where all posts as of late this morning were copied.

http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?82-Febriary-2021-VM-Special-Meeting