Originally Posted by
Egidijus Zeromskis
I move to amend the paragraph:
"In any year the number of class A voting members eligible per province or territory will be one class A member for the first fifty or part thereof of class B members in said province or territory as of April 30 of the immediately proceeding fiscal year, and one additional class A member for each subsequent fifty or part thereof."
to
"In any year the number of class A voting members eligible per province or territory will be one class A member for the first hundred or part thereof of class B members in said province or territory as of April 30 of the immediately proceeding fiscal year, and one additional class A member for each subsequent hundred or part thereof."
The main reason - reduction of a class A members' number. Quality over quantity.
Need a seconder and a support in voting.
Probably it can be used only the next year (2015/16).
Seriously, we can't go one single AGM without THIS cropping up again? What problem are you trying to solve? You say quality over quantity, but the motion does absolutely nothing to ensure quality.
Christopher Mallon
FIDE Arbiter