Wow, the first vote in the history of the CFC online with "No" as the first option instead of "Yes" ... any little trick to try to win, Vlad?
Also, no link to what's actually being voted on. So I'll provide!
Originally Posted by
Egidijus Zeromskis
Is it your ruling as a Chair for my Point of Interest?
Then, I move a motion to appeal.
Reasoning:
The procedure shall be first to increase the number. Call for nominations. Discuss. Vote.
As the matter is before the Voting Members, the board of directors "right" to appoint is not valid here. The board of directors don't elect anyone. They appoint. Nobody from directors has called the board of directors' meeting to appoint anyone as well.
(If the motion need the seconder, someone definitely will support it)
Originally Posted by
Christopher Mallon
I second the motion to appeal.
Originally Posted by
Christopher Mallon
I would also like to add to the point of order:
The Agenda, which was sent out as part of the notice of meeting, lists Patricia Gamliel as a candidate for the position of Director at Large. Which I believe is the position already occupied by Mark Dutton. It makes no mention of a motion to increase the size of the Executive. So we saw no motion in advance, and we still haven't seen a motion, just a rambling description by Vlad..
Christopher Mallon
FIDE Arbiter