Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: 06.4 Nominations for National Appeals Committee (5 to be elected)

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Charlottetown, PE
    Posts
    2,158
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark S. Dutton, I.A. View Post
    I am willing to stand for one of the 5 positions on the NAC.

    I have been the Chairman of this Committee for the last dozen years.

    Thanks for the nomination Lyle!

    I completely disagree with Fred McKim that the NAC consist of non CFC directors.

    This is not a luxury we can afford. We need experienced IAs on this committee.


    Thanks for your consideration.

    Mark S. Dutton, I.A., I.O.
    Hi Mark. Vlad has since posted that the appeal of the NAC Decision was a one time occurrence, so from my perspective there should be no issues in the future.
    Last edited by Vladimir Drkulec; 08-22-2017 at 01:03 PM.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Tecumseh, ON
    Posts
    3,268
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark S. Dutton, I.A. View Post
    I am willing to stand for one of the 5 positions on the NAC.

    I have been the Chairman of this Committee for the last dozen years.

    Thanks for the nomination Lyle!

    I completely disagree with Fred McKim that the NAC consist of non CFC directors.

    This is not a luxury we can afford. We need experienced IAs on this committee.


    Thanks for your consideration.

    Mark S. Dutton, I.A., I.O.
    I agree with the idea that we need the most experienced IA's possible on the NAC and on the Executive. When there is a potential for an appeal to the NAC both directors and employees of the CFC need to butt out and avoid fueling any controversy and most importantly not provide any incorrect information to applicants. The handbook is quite out of date in this and other areas and should not be relied upon as many of its provisions were written when no one had email. In this most recent case, I believe that the NAC performed admirably while under time pressure to come to a decision. I'm sure this most recent case will be featured in an upcoming FIDE arbiter magazine.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Charlottetown, PE
    Posts
    2,158
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vladimir Drkulec View Post
    I agree with the idea that we need the most experienced IA's possible on the NAC and on the Executive. When there is a potential for an appeal to the NAC both directors and employees of the CFC need to butt out and avoid fueling any controversy and most importantly not provide any incorrect information to applicants. The handbook is quite out of date in this and other areas and should not be relied upon as many of its provisions were written when no one had email. In this most recent case, I believe that the NAC performed admirably while under time pressure to come to a decision. I'm sure this most recent case will be featured in an upcoming FIDE arbiter magazine.
    Vlad, I would tend to disagree with your contention that "we need the most experienced IA's possible on the ... Executive". Obviously that is a useful asset, but it takes other skills beside that one to be good Executive member. Just today you said it yourself, diversity of opinion is important.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    591

    Default

    I side with Mark and Lyle on this question. I also agree with Les Bunning that the Executive should not have heard this appeal and would like to present a motion for the next VM meeting to clarify that NAC decisions are FINAL.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Tecumseh, ON
    Posts
    3,268
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fred McKim View Post
    Vlad, I would tend to disagree with your contention that "we need the most experienced IA's possible on the ... Executive". Obviously that is a useful asset, but it takes other skills beside that one to be good Executive member. Just today you said it yourself, diversity of opinion is important.

    We have three of them on the Executive out of seven and it is good to have some of them.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Charlottetown, PE
    Posts
    2,158
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vladimir Drkulec View Post
    We have three of them on the Executive out of seven and it is good to have some of them.
    You are correct there, Vlad.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    46

    Default

    I nominate Pierre Dénommée for the National appeals Commitee (NAC).

    Richard Bérubé

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •