Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40

Thread: My boycott of CFC Active events

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ottawa Ontario National Master Former Gov.
    Posts
    11,138
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    It would be nice to know if at this year's CFC Annual Meeting any governors/executives are going to raise the matter of the CFC Active rating system being deflated - as Chris Mallon's first post in this thread acknowleged.

    The CFC's Rating Auditor has an especially shameful role in this typical piece of CFC neglect .

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ottawa Ontario National Master Former Gov.
    Posts
    11,138
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Now that the new CFC Executive has been elected at the CFC AGM in Edmonton, I would hope that the new Rating Auditor would expeditiously place the CFC Active rating system under scrutiny and subsequently correct its evident and serious deflation.

  3. #3

    Default

    Hi Kevin:

    I'd suggest you also e-mail Bill Doubleday a copy of this post - direct communication may also help.

    Bob

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ottawa Ontario National Master Former Gov.
    Posts
    11,138
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Hi Bob

    I sent Bill a request on the subject at hand, by email just now. It's sort of nice to see the new CFC Executive is listed under the 'Contacts' link on the CFC website already. I previously was unsuccessful sending an email to Bill on a different matter, possibly because I had technical difficulties (I can't quite remember). Anyway I'll see what comes of the email I sent him today.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ottawa Ontario National Master Former Gov.
    Posts
    11,138
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Pacey
    Hi Bob

    I sent Bill a request on the subject at hand, by email just now. It's sort of nice to see the new CFC Executive is listed under the 'Contacts' link on the CFC website already. I previously was unsuccessful sending an email to Bill on a different matter, possibly because I had technical difficulties (I can't quite remember). Anyway I'll see what comes of the email I sent him today.
    No reply yet from Bill. Now that my memory has been jogged, this isn't the first time my e-mails have been ignored, i.e. not because of technical problems.

    Complaining to friends can be awkward, especially if you owe them favours . I'll give Bill (and Eric by extension) more time to straighten out the CFC's Active rating system. It seems too late for me not to avoid playing in my club's first Active event in September though.

  6. #6

    Default

    Hi Kevin:

    My practice is usually to give someone a week to respond. Then I forward the original message with a new note : " in case you may have missed this in your " inbox ", since I have had no reply after one week "...........

    We all miss things from time to time, or put off replying 'til later, and then it falls off the radar - I don't think a jog after one week is harassment.

    Bob

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Christopher Mallon

    From the table it looks like BC lost a very active organizer, just as a guess.
    Is not the case. In that year, many of the junior events were rated Active.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Kitchener, ON
    Posts
    2,236
    Blog Entries
    37

    Default

    Yes I remembered later that that was around the time they changed the rule to allow Junior events of any time control to be Standard rated.

  9. #9

    Default

    There is currently 3 active events posted on the BCCF webpage. One for May, June and July. All of them Non-CFC events. This is a prime example of why adding barriers to CFC events is a bad idea. 3/6 events posted are not CFC rated.

    Personally in the last 6 months I have played in 2 non cfc events and only one CFC event.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Pacey
    Since the CFC Ratings Auditor/Committee nor the CFC Governors/Executive seems to be in any hurry to do anything about the longstanding obvious deflation of CFC Active ratings, I will now be boycotting CFC Active events until a correction to the CFC's Active rating system is made. I do not wish to pay an Active rating fee in order to continue to receive a clearly deflated rating.
    They are not deflated, they are statistically not significant. Go to the crosstable section and you will see that there are almost no rapid rated tournaments in Canada. If you play 100 regular games and 6 rapid games in a year, your rapid rating cannot follow your true playing strength. This does not mean that the rating is deflated : it only means that it is based on a too small number of games to be significant. Regular and rapid games are as different as a 5 000m and a marathon : proficiency in one does not necessary imply proficiency in the other. You can get an accurate rapid rating only by playing many rated rapid games.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •