Please vote in the poll above. NOTE: should the report be rejected, we will continue with the status quo. This question applies in the event of its passage. Ballots will remain sealed on this question.
support Edward Porper's contract being extended to April 2014.
support an RFP going out, with a hiring decision being made for a 1 May 2013 start at the latest.
abstain.
Please vote in the poll above. NOTE: should the report be rejected, we will continue with the status quo. This question applies in the event of its passage. Ballots will remain sealed on this question.
Last edited by Michael von Keitz; 01-04-2013 at 10:25 PM.
Now that current CCN editor Edward Porper is a CFC Officer and signed in as a Governor, for the sake of clarity I would like to ask if he has a valid vote in this particular poll.
Duh .... right...sometimes wonder where my head is at!!
I did vote in the poll as I didn't think/realize I wasn't supposed to. To the best of my knowledge, politicians are allowed to vote in elections that also concern themselves, to give but one example.
The system accepted my vote as well.
Obviously, I didn't mean to cheat...
I'll leave to a chair to enforce the Handbook:
15. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Whenever a proposal is being considered which puts any CFC officer in a potential conflict of interest he shall declare the conflict and abstain from discussion, voting or other involvement in the matter.
Though an Editor may be not a true officer.
Last edited by Egidijus Zeromskis; 01-07-2013 at 11:40 AM.
.*-1
Obviously somebody can vote for themselves in a political election.
In this case now that Edward is an officer (Fund Raising Officer) he falls under the conflict of interest rule. Nothing is simple. He has openly admitted to voting for himself, saving Lyle the trouble of looking through these while the election is in progress. We can subtract one from the YES side, unless Lyle comes on and tells us he has adjusted it.