Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: 7. 2013-N All meetings made public (McKim/Bond) - commentary only

  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Christopher Mallon View Post
    I'll move an amendment: "With a majority vote of Executive members a motion or discussion at a meeting may be started in the private forum as a confidential discussion. Such discussion may be made public by 2/3 majority vote of the Governors (via a properly seconded motion, which is also confidential until such time as it passes). Such a motion must be moved and seconded within the timelines of the meeting and a vote must be held within two weeks, if it is not possible during the meeting."
    It seems Pierre is uninterested in seconding. If there is an interested party out there, please state so soon.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,492

    Default

    I'll second Chris motion.

    I think there should be doors to confidential discussions.
    .*-1

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    1,401

    Default

    Definitely not - we don't have the authority to bind previous Governors' / Executives' decisions - we can only move forward from here.

    As far as I'm concerned retroactive legislation is always a bad thing.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •