This is a distinct improvement over the earlier attempt.
From some of the commentary, there does seem to be some confusion over the roles and responsibilities of governors of an organization. The unhelpful rhetoric about
"free speech" demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of the role. As a governor, one is entrusted with taking the best decision in the interests of all stakeholders, based to some extent on confidential information and discussion shared only with other governors. In exchange, one voluntarily surrenders the untrammeled right to sound off in public.
This is perfectly proper good governance practice as applied at all levels of organization.
If a governor cannot live with an important decision taken by the federation, he should resign. He would then be free to air his views publicly.
So long as he remains on the inside, as a governor, he is bound by the terms of confidentiality as set out in the code.
If a governor is not prepared to abide by the strictures of confidentiality, he must resign.