View Poll Results: BIRT The CFC cover any Olympic fundraising shortfall.

Voters
22. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    9 40.91%
  • No

    10 45.45%
  • Abstain

    3 13.64%
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: STRAW POLL: FIDE Rep on Olympic Fundraising

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ottawa Ontario National Master Former Gov.
    Posts
    11,124
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Assuming we don't lose too many members because of it, your plan seems viable, Chris.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Kitchener, ON
    Posts
    2,236
    Blog Entries
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Pacey View Post
    Assuming we don't lose too many members because of it, your plan seems viable, Chris.
    I see it as a viable starting point for a discussion anyway.

    I suggested earlier that we conduct a poll via the newsletter to see what member's opinions of the newsletter were - along with other options for spending the money. Another Governor thought that was ridiculous as many people don't even get the newsletter and thus wouldn't respond to the poll.

    However, that really proves my point in a way... if they don't get the newsletter now, they won't miss it either.
    Christopher Mallon
    FIDE Arbiter

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ottawa Ontario National Master Former Gov.
    Posts
    11,124
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    For those who haven't seen it, here is a link to a thread from the Governors Private Forum that I believe Chris is refering to (in his post above) concerning a previous discussion about scaling back/axing the Newsletter:

    http://www.chesscanada.info/forum/showthread.php?t=2358
    Last edited by Kevin Pacey; 04-06-2012 at 03:27 PM. Reason: Spelling

  4. #4

    Default

    If you would like, if you were to open a poll on this topic in the English Forum on or about May 1st, I could point the members to it on the next distribution of the newsletter. Just so everyone is aware, approximately 70% of members receive the newsletter directly. Exactly how many of the remaining 30% receive it by indirect means is beyond the scope of my knowledge, but I know there are at least a few.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Tecumseh, ON
    Posts
    3,280
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I think funding the Olympiad teams makes more sense than spending $18k on an email newsletter that few seem to care about.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vladimir Drkulec View Post
    I think funding the Olympiad teams makes more sense than spending $18k on an email newsletter that few seem to care about.
    We just need to be careful that we're not underestimating the newsletter's popularity. Shooting first and asking questions later could be disastrous.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Kitchener, ON
    Posts
    2,236
    Blog Entries
    37

    Default

    I'm not sure a public poll is the best way to go. Using actual poll software, feeding in all the email addresses which receive the newsletter, would be far better. I'll look around and see if there's anything free we can use.
    Christopher Mallon
    FIDE Arbiter

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •