Now that Lyle has seconded your amendment above, Egidijus, would you be able to provide a rationale for it at this time?
I'd repeat myself, more or less, in saying I haven't got a reason to vote in favour of this amendment, as I haven't seen a reason not to trust the modeling behind the original motion. However Paul Leblanc suggested 2399 as an optional dividing line (for no longer awarding bonus points), so I wonder if there was a variant model done for that option as well.
The old CFC rating formula that was around in the 1980's (if not before) chose 2299 as the dividing line. That old formula held up well for many years, I'm told, until it was changed (but by then the number of CFC members may have become significantly smaller).