No.
I already wasted two hours last night wading thru all the arguments to rule on motion 2011-E. Which is related to this issue and when reviewed together with motion 2011-D clearly indicates flaws and inconsistencies with motion 2010-18. So now I must question whether my ruling yesterday is correct with regards to the 50% quorum issue.
So I will not be making any more rulings regarding constitutional issues for the duration of this meeting. Can we please debate the real issues.
I have already ruled that motions 2011-D, 2011-E, 2011-F are constitutional amendments. End of discussion!