Search:

Type: Posts; User: Christopher Mallon; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.10 seconds.

  1. It is in fact up to the provinces to decide on...

    It is in fact up to the provinces to decide on their membership fees, not for the CFC to dictate what any fee should be. For example, the Ontario youth fee is not proportional to the adult fee.
  2. I fail to understand how this is in any way...

    I fail to understand how this is in any way complicated? It is exactly the same as normal annual memberships.

    The last Ontario resident who purchased a life membership was instructed by the CFC...
  3. Exactly what Bob said. The motion does not IMPOSE...

    Exactly what Bob said. The motion does not IMPOSE a fee or certain fee structure, it simply requires the CFC to collect that fee should a province choose to require it. Which should be a no-brainer...
  4. It would be entirely going-forward. It requires...

    It would be entirely going-forward. It requires that at the time of selling a CFC Life Membership, if any fees are due to the province those must be collected at the same time.

    In other words, no...
  5. Vlad this is getting a little OT for this thread...

    Vlad this is getting a little OT for this thread but I don't see that implemented NFP-compliant bylaws for the government as automatically invalidating the entire CFC handbook. We just have to make...
  6. AFAIK the inter-provincial can of worms has not...

    AFAIK the inter-provincial can of worms has not previously been opened in Canada (except Quebec).
  7. This motion would have no effect on BC; the way...

    This motion would have no effect on BC; the way it is worded, it says "any Provincial Life Member Fees set by the provincial affiliate for the province in which the member resides.” so if BCCF does...
  8. There should be no extra workload. Provincial and...

    There should be no extra workload. Provincial and National expiry dates should be the same. That's basically the point of the motion.
Results 1 to 8 of 8