Originally Posted by
Bob Armstrong
Hi Ken:
Good tweaking - didn't occur to me. I entirely concur as an amendment to option 2. I hope the committee will in their report, highlight this minor option for the governors, if it is not the top vote-getter. It has an important legal foundation.
I personally, however, voted for the most stringent option before eliminating someone - option 4. If the executive can't get a full 3/4 of the members on their side, the benefit should go to the offender - s/he has too much support, and any action should not take place. But option 2, with Ken's amendment, is second best in my mind, and I could also accept it.
Bob A