Date of the Prize Policy?
Hi Michael:
You've listed the Can. Junior Champions for the last 5 years:
2005 - Shiyam Thavandiran
2006 - Bindi Cheng
2007 - Leonid Gerzhoy
2008 - Artiom Samsonkin
2009 - Raja Panjwani
The current policy is that " the winner can apply the prize to any major international tournament of his choice other than the World Junior if s/he so chooses ".
When did that policy come in? What was the policy before it was instituted?
Thanks.
Bob
Canadian Junior - Time for a Prize Policy Change?
Thx to Michael Barron, Youth Coordinator, for the quick answer and the additional facts on the Canadian Junior in the prior post on this topic.
I have a major concern about the current prize policy, despite the fact that Michael indicates that the participants preferred the new policy he developed - that the winner gets to use the prize $$ for any other major international tournament of his/her choice, if not going to the World Junior.
It appears to me that the history of the policy may be:
1. 2005 - Shiyam Thavandiran is Champion, but is not going to the World Junior. He does not get his prize $$. One could surmise that the reason was that at that time the policy was that the prize defaulted to the second place finisher, etc., if they wanted to go to the World Junior for Canada. If no one went, CFC kept the prize $$ as general revenue.
2. 2006 - Bindi Cheng is Champion. He uses his prize to go to the World Junior. We can assume the policy was the same as in 2005.
3. 2007 - Leonid Gerzhoy is Champion. He uses his prize to go to the World Junior ( where there were problems getting his Canadian credentials recognized ). We can assume the policy was the same as in 2005.
4. 2008 - There is definite lack of interest in the Canadian Junior and it is about to be cancelled. Why is this I wonder? I can see that one of the problems of the old policy is that if a junior does not want to spend his/her own money to go to the World Junior, beyond the $$ prize, and organizer room and board, then they might not want to play in the Can. Junior at all, because they know their prize will get defaulted over to the second place finisher, etc.. Michael, as Can.Junior organizer that year, consulted with juniors, and found they would play if he instituted a new policy - that the Champion , if s/he was not going to go to the World Junior, could use the prize $$ for any other major international tournament of their choice. Michael instituted this policy for his 2008 Can. Junior, and he got a good turnout of players. The Champion was Artiom Samsonkin - he did not go to the World Junior, but I assume he used his prize for some other tournament, under the new policy.
5. 2009 - Raja Panjwani is Champion. Like Artiom, he decides to use the prize $$ for a tournament other than this year's October World Junior in Argentina.
My Concern:
I can understand that the participants like the new policy - it gives them surety that they can keep the prize if they win, and they don't have to commit to going to the World Junior to go into the Canadian Junior. So what has happened is that the Canadian Junior has just become a tournament like all other tournaments, where you can play for a significant prize, regardless of whether you have any interest at all in the World Junior. My concern is that yes, the Can. Junior will attract players, but more and more of them will be playing with no intention of going to the World Junior. For most of them, it will just be another strong tournament where they have a chance at a good prize. So less and less often will Canada have a participant in the World Junior! More and more of the winners will be of the type who are not going to go to the World Junior.
The Question - Do we just want a Canadian Junior that draws players, and that just picks a Canadian Champion, and no longer tries to get a candidate for the World Junior??
Comments:
The whole point of the Canadian Junior historically was for Canada to participate in the World Junior. And it did this by having a policy that the prize had to be used to go to the World Junior. And if the Champion wasn't going, then the prize defaulted over to the second place finisher, etc., so that Canada would hopefully be assured or a participant in the World Junior. I fear that the new policy has lost the point of the Canadian Junior. It is not supposed to be just another tournament like any weekend swiss ( as Steve Douglas properly noted in an earlier post ).
My Proposal:
CFC should go back to the policy that the prize has to be used to go to that year's World Junior. If the Champion is not going, then the prize defaults over to the second place finisher, etc.. However, unlike the prior policy, I think that if no one goes one year, the money does NOT go into CFC general revenue ! It is kept in the Canadian Junior account, and is added to the prize fund in the next year's Can. Junior. Also, if it is true that there are fewer juniors willing to play under this policy, then if one year the Can. Junior is cancelled, again the prize goes over to the next year. I would think that would guarantee good participation the next year, with a double prize + room and board expense paid by the organizers of the World Junior.
What do you think of my proposal?
Bob
( P.S. I couldn't find out how to combine a poll with this post - if some one knows, could they do a poll - " Bob Armstrong's new Canadian Junior Policy should be implemented " - Yes/No/I'm unsure. Thanks.)